Can Rectal Indomethacin Be an Alternative Local Anesthetic Method to Intrauterine Lidocaine During Endometrial Biopsy? A Clinical Observational Prospective Study

dc.authorid0000-0002-2908-4530
dc.contributor.authorDemircan Karadağ, Sinem
dc.contributor.authorKaradağ, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, Mehmet Baki
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Abdülkadir
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Endometrial biopsy is a pain-related gynecological procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of rectal indomethacin and intrauterine lidocaine on pain control during endometrial sampling. Material and Methods: This clinical observational prospective trial was conducted in 120 patients with the complaint of abnormal uterine bleeding who presented at Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, between January 2017 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups. The rectal group had 64 patients, to whom indomethacin was given as a local anesthetic. The intrauterine group had 56 patients, for whom lidocaine was the local anesthetic used. Endometrial biopsy was performed by using a no. 4 Karman cannula. The primary goal of measurement was pain intensity assessed by a visual analog scale before, during, and 10 minutes after the procedure. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean age, body mass index, weight and median levels of gravidity, parity and abortion. The median pain scores of the two groups during and 10 minutes after the procedure were similar (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, rectal indomethacin was shown to be equal to intrauterine anesthesia for reducing pain during the endometrial biopsy. Rectal indomethacin may be an alternative drug to relieve pain during gynecological procedures. Further researches with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm our findings.
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/jcog.2020-73612
dc.identifier.endpage19
dc.identifier.issn2619-9467
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095711124
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage14
dc.identifier.trdizinid366002
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2020-73612
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/366002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12440
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000871239600003
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkiye Klinikleri
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectEndometrium
dc.subjectbiopsy
dc.subjectindomethacin
dc.subjectvisual analog scale
dc.subjectanesthesia
dc.titleCan Rectal Indomethacin Be an Alternative Local Anesthetic Method to Intrauterine Lidocaine During Endometrial Biopsy? A Clinical Observational Prospective Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
12440.pdf
Boyut:
324.95 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format