Effect of Oral Isosorbide Mononitrate Therapy on Proteinuria in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome

dc.contributor.authorBakan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÇaklılı, Özge Telci
dc.contributor.authorEcder, Sabahat Alışır
dc.contributor.authorŞakşak Kuzgun, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorAydın Bahat, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorElçioğlu, Ömer Celal
dc.contributor.authorOdabaşı, Ali Rıza
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T14:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Proteinuria is the most important causitive factor in the progression of renal failure Angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin- receptor blockers (ARBs) are shown to reduce proteinuria however in some patients, these drugs are not adequately effective. Oral nitrates may reduce proteinuria by way of glomerular vasodilation with resultant decrease in intraglomerular pressure. In this study the possible effects of oral isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) on proteinuria in patients with nephrotic syndrome was investigated. Material and Methods: A total of 36 patients with nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria >1 g/day) requiring oral IMN for symptomatic ischemic heart disease were enrolled. Results: Proteinuria was significantly decreased with the initiation of IMN (p=0.02) in all patients. In patients on combined ACEI and ARB treatment, IMN was effective in reducing proteinuria (p=0.01) however it was not effective in patients on single agent therapy as ACEI or ARB; (p=0.15). IMN was also effective in diabetic patients (p=0.02), but not effective in non-diabetic patients (p=0.33). IMN was ineffective in patients on calcium channel blocker treatment (CCB), (p=0.96). Decrease in proteinuria was associated with baseline proteinuria (p<0.001). Patients who responded to IMN therapy were significantly younger (p=0.01). In the logistic regression analysis for predicting the effectiveness of IMN, age, baseline proteinuria, ACEI, ARB, CCB use, presence of diabetes were included as independent variables. Only age and ACEI use were significant parametres. Conclusion: Oral nitrates may be effective for reducing proteinuria in patients with nephrotic syndrome. This favorable effect seemed to be more prominent in younger, diabetic patients using both ACEI and ARB.
dc.identifier.doi10.5222/iksst.2018.37880
dc.identifier.endpage74
dc.identifier.issn2148-273X
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage70
dc.identifier.trdizinid289341
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5222/iksst.2018.37880
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/289341
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/5337
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofİstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20250302
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıp
dc.subjectÜroloji ve Nefroloji
dc.titleEffect of Oral Isosorbide Mononitrate Therapy on Proteinuria in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5337.pdf
Boyut:
446.79 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format