Accuracy of Inchworm Sign on Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

dc.authorid0000-0002-3386-971X
dc.authorid0000-0002-5822-7799
dc.authorid0000-0003-0202-0454
dc.authorid0000-0002-2803-6481
dc.contributor.authorKazan, Huseyin Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorCulpan, Meftun
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Nesrin
dc.contributor.authorKeser, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorIplikci, Ayberk
dc.contributor.authorAtış, Ramazan Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Asıf
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:36:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Inchworm sign is a finding on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) and is used to better stratify T-staging in muscle invasive (MIBC) and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). An uninterrupted low submucosal signal on DWI, defined as inchworm sign (IS), indicates NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the diagnostic accuracy of IS in primary bladder cancer, as well as find agreement between the urologists and the radiologist. METHODS: Between December 2018 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 95 primary bladder cancer patients who had undergone multiparametric-MRI before transurethral resection. Patients with former bladder cancer history, tumors smaller than 10 mm, and MRI without proper protocol, as well as patients who did not attend follow-up, were excluded. In total, 71 patients' images were evaluated by a genitourinary specialist radiologist and two urologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of IS and VI-RADS in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC, and interreader agreement between the radiologist and urologists were analyzed. RESULTS: During follow-up, 38 patients (53.5%) were IS-positive, while 33 patients (46.5%) were negative. Among the 33 patients with negative IS, 14 patients (42.4%) had MIBC. Meanwhile, two out of the 38 IS-positive patients (5.3%) had MIBC (p = 0.00). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of IS in predicting MIBC were 87.5%, 63.6%, 41.2% and 94.6%, respectively. The interobserver agreement between the urologists and radiologist was almost perfect ((K) = 0.802 and (K) = 0.745) CONCLUSION: The absence of IS on DWI is useful in differentiating MIBC from NMIBC. It is a simple finding that can be interpreted by urologists.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BLC-211535
dc.identifier.endpage44
dc.identifier.issn2352-3727
dc.identifier.issn2352-3735
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid38994517
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127138424
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage35
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-211535
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/9203
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000771505600004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIos Press
dc.relation.ispartofBladder Cancer
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectDiffusion-weighted MRI
dc.subjectinchworm sign
dc.subjectinterreader agreement
dc.subjectmultiparametric MRI
dc.subjectVI-RADS
dc.titleAccuracy of Inchworm Sign on Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
9203.pdf
Boyut:
293.69 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format