Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite

dc.authorid0000-0003-3299-3361
dc.authorid0000-0003-4994-6780
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, G.
dc.contributor.authorColangeli, M.
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, T.
dc.contributor.authorDeDeus, G.
dc.contributor.authorPanzetta, C.
dc.contributor.authorCastagnola, R.
dc.contributor.authorGrande, N. M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives To evaluate the efficacy of a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of irrigants during and after the instrumentation compared with that of a conventional activation (CA) performed only after the instrumentation to remove smear layer and debris using different activation devices. Materials and methods A total of 70 single-rooted teeth were divided into a control group (no activation, n = 10) and two different experimental groups according to the irrigant activation protocol used: group 1 (CA), in which sodium hypochlorite was activated only after the use of the last mechanical file, and group 2 (SIA), in which activation was performed during and after the instrumentation. The two groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the activation device used (n = 10): passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI, subgroup a), EndoActivator (EA, subgroup b), and EDDY (subgroup c). The roots were split longitudinally and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the presence of debris and smear layer, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results All activation protocols and devices were more effective than control group in removing smear layer and debris from all root canal thirds (P < 0.05), except for CA-EA (group 1b) in the apical third. In the apical third, SIA was found to be more effective than CA (P < 0.05) to remove smear layer and residual debris when PUI was used, to remove the smear layer when EA was used (P < 0.05), and to remove residual debris when EDDY was used (P < 0.05). PUI and EDDY removed statistically more smear layer and debris than EA in the apical third (P < 0.05). Conclusions The SIA technique improved the smear layer and debris removal from the apical third and debris removal from the coronal third, and PUI and EDDY were more effective than EA in the apical third.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-020-03358-6
dc.identifier.endpage245
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid32500405
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086015121
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage237
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03358-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13154
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000537979700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.subjectActivation
dc.subjectStepwise intraoperative activation
dc.subjectPassive ultrasonic activation
dc.subjectSonic activation
dc.titleEvaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13154
Boyut:
969.13 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format