AI Anxiety: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis

dc.contributor.authorAkalin, Betul
dc.contributor.authorAlp, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorTapan, Birkan
dc.contributor.authorDemirbas, Mehmet Besir
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-16T19:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: Artificial Intelligence Anxiety (AI Anxiety) refers to the apprehension and distrust individuals may feel in response to the rapid development and integration of artificial intelligence into various aspects of life. These emotions are often driven by concerns about AI's potential implications in domains such as employment, security, privacy, and human interaction. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on 'AI Anxiety' published between 2011 and 2024. Methods: A total of 80 articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database were analysed. The study evaluated parameters including the most cited publications, annual distribution of research, contributing countries, leading publishers, main research domains, and keyword trends. Network analyses involving coauthorship, author citations, institutional citations, and country-level citations were conducted using VOSviewer software. Results: The findings indicate a notable increase in AI Anxiety-related studies, particularly between 2021 and 2024. Highly cited articles include works by Youn (2021) and Wang (2022). The United States emerged as the leading contributor, followed by China and T & uuml;rkiye. Prominent publishers were Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Taylor & Francis. In the coauthorship network, authors such as Merlo and Johnson occupied central positions. Frequently used keywords included 'Artificial Intelligence', 'AI Anxiety', 'Technology Acceptance Model', and 'Trust'. Country citation analysis revealed that the United States and China occupied central roles with strong citation linkages to other countries. Conclusion: The study highlights the growing scholarly interest in the psychological and societal implications of artificial intelligence. It also provides a roadmap for future research directions by identifying key contributors, collaborative patterns, and thematic trends within the field of AI Anxiety.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors received no specific funding for this work. Funding Source: Medline
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.70296
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.issn1365-2753
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.pmid41099325
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018893163
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/15284
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001605451100011
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectAI anxiety
dc.subjectbibliometric analysis
dc.subjectweb of science
dc.titleAI Anxiety: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar