Practice Patterns of Turkish Urologists Regarding Intravesical Botulinum Toxin-A Injections for Overactive Bladder and Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Survey Study

dc.contributor.authorCoşkun, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorÇorabay, Seniha
dc.contributor.authorTahra, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKarakeçi, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorÇolakoğlu, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorDanacıoğlu, Yavuz Onur
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T14:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Objective: We aimed to understand the practices of Turkish urologists using intravesical onabotulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injections for refractory overactive bladder (OAB) and neurogenic lower urinary tract dys- function (NLUTD) treatment, focusing on pre, peri, and postoperative man- agement. We also explored the potential influence of functional urology workload on these practices. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional sur- vey was circulated via the Turkish Association of Urology's WhatsApp group, collecting data on practices and preferences related to BoNT-A treat- ment. Statistical analysis was performed for comparisons between categori- cal groups. Results: 65 urologists participated. Most targeted population was NLUTD patients (40%). Preoperatively, spinal or general anesthesia was the preferred method (55.4%). For perioperative prophylaxis, second-generation antibiotics were popular (43.1%). BoNT-A dosage typically was 100 units for first OAB application (92.3%), while 200 units for first NLUTD application (70.8%). The injection site was usually the detrusor (44.6%), with most re- fraining from trigone injections (63.1%). Respondents with the functional urology workload >25%, favored 300 units for the first NLUTD application (p=0.009), trigone injections (p<0.001), and a second application between 3-5 months (p=0.016). Conclusion: Significant variations have been identi- fied in the usage of BoNT-A for the treatment of OAB and NLUTD by Turk- ish urologists, largely influenced by the functional urology workload. Understanding these differences will help refine treatment strategies and highlight the need for more research and more specific guidelines.
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/urology.2023-98660
dc.identifier.endpage75
dc.identifier.issn2587-0483
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage67
dc.identifier.trdizinid1254260
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/urology.2023-98660
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1254260
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/5482
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Reconstructive Urology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20250302
dc.subjectUrinary bladder
dc.subjectcross-sectional studies
dc.subjectUrinary bladder
dc.subjectoveractive
dc.subjectneurogenic
dc.subjectbotulinum toxins
dc.subjectType A
dc.titlePractice Patterns of Turkish Urologists Regarding Intravesical Botulinum Toxin-A Injections for Overactive Bladder and Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Survey Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5482.pdf
Boyut:
227.95 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format