Current status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits

dc.authorid0000-0002-1403-7643
dc.authorid0000-0002-2020-1913
dc.authorid0000-0001-7651-4321
dc.authorid0000-0003-2130-2529
dc.authorid0000-0002-5619-8963
dc.contributor.authorParisi, Amilcare
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Ninh T.
dc.contributor.authorReim, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shu
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Zhi-Wei
dc.contributor.authorBrower, Steven T.
dc.contributor.authorAzagra, Juan-Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Gastric cancer represents a great challenge for health care providers and requires a multidisciplinary approach in which surgery plays the main role. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of laparoscopy and more recently with the spread of robotic surgery, but a number of issues are currently being investigate, including the limitations in performing effective extended lymph node dissections and, in this context, the real advantages of using robotic systems, the possible role for advanced Gastric Cancer, the reproducibility of completely intracorporeal techniques and the oncological results achievable during follow-up. Method: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed to identify articles published until April 2014 which reported outcomes of surgical treatment for gastric cancer and that used minimally invasive surgical technology. Articles that deal with endoscopic technology were excluded. Results: A total of 362 articles were evaluated. After the review process, data in 115 articles were analyzed. Conclusion: A multicenter study with a large number of patients is now needed to further investigate the safety and efficacy as well as long-term outcomes of robotic surgery, traditional laparoscopy and the open approach. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipCARIT foundation (Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Terni e Narni)
dc.description.sponsorshipCARIT foundation (Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Terni e Narni) for no profit financial support of IMIGASTRIC. LOGIX S.r.l. provided IT study solutions for IMIGASTRIC.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.021
dc.identifier.endpage40
dc.identifier.issn1743-9191
dc.identifier.issn1743-9159
dc.identifier.pmid25758348
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84940453453
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage34
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12164
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353986200008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectGastric cancer
dc.subjectGastrectomy
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgery
dc.subjectRobotic surgery
dc.subjectLaparoscopic surgery
dc.titleCurrent status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits
dc.typeReview

Dosyalar