Oncologic outcomes of postoperative adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer

dc.contributor.authorSendogan, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Turgay
dc.contributor.authorKeser, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorHancilar, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorAtış, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Asıf
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncological results of patients with the diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and subse-quent adjuvant (ART) or salvage radiotherapy (SRT).Material and methods A total of 145 patients underwent open RRP for prostate cancer and subsequent ART or SRT postoperatively between 2010 and 2019. ART (n = 56) is defined as the group of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/mL or with positive lymph nodes without PSA increase who re-ceived radiotherapy within the first 6 months of urinary continence. SRT (n = 89) is defined as the group of patients with PSA >0.2 ng/mL who received RT before PSA amounted to 0.5 ng/mL.Results Statistically no significant difference was found between groups in terms of age, prostate volume, final pathology Gleason scores, lymphadenectomy, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), time to relapse after radiotherapy, development of biochemical recurrence and disease progression. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin positivity were significantly higher in the ART group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of biochemical recurrence-free survival, while cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates were significantly higher in the SRT group.Conclusions It was found that cancer-specific and overall survival was better in the SRT group. It will be more appropriate to follow-up until the recurrence and then to perform SRT after the relapse in the postoperative period.
dc.identifier.doi10.5173/ceju.2023.190
dc.identifier.issn2080-4806
dc.identifier.issn2080-4873
dc.identifier.pmid37483851
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164591751
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8074
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000966798400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPolish Urological Assoc
dc.relation.ispartofCentral European Journal of Urology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectbiochemical recurrence
dc.subjectadjuvant radiotherapy
dc.subjectsalvage radiotherapy
dc.titleOncologic outcomes of postoperative adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8074.pdf
Boyut:
723.04 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format