What is the best anesthesia method for circumcision? Comparison of local and general anesthesia: Prospective clinical study

dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Emre
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorTahra, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorEfiloğlu, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorAtış, Ramazan Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Asıf
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T14:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: It was aimed to compare the methods of local anesthesia and general anesthesia with circumcision study questionnaire applied before and after circumcision. Material and Methods: Parents of children aged 0-12 years who applied for circumcision between June and December 2021 who agreed to participate in the study were asked to fill out the circumcision study questionnaire. All patients were operated with same surgeon and surgical method. Patients were divided into local and general anesthesia groups, and data were compared. Results: Our study included 282 patients; general anesthesia was applied to 132 patients (48.9%), and local anesthesia was applied to 144 patients (51.1%). Age and weight averages of patients who were administered local anesthesia and age preferences suitable for circumcision were significantly lower than those in general anesthesia group (p:0.001). There was no significant difference between socioeconomic levels, educational status and reasons for circumcision in both groups (p?0.05). Patients’ need for postoperative care and recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (p:0.001). Conclusion: Circumcision is a surgical operation that can be performed safely with local or general anesthesia. Parents who want circumcision in the early months of life mostly prefer local anesthesia. Postoperative recovery time is shorter in this group. Preference for anesthesia has changed in favor of general anesthesia in advanced ages, including the sexual development period. The knowledge and awareness level of our society about circumcision has increased compared to previous years.
dc.identifier.doi10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1118829
dc.identifier.endpage23
dc.identifier.issn1305-2489
dc.identifier.issn2687-1955
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage16
dc.identifier.trdizinid1158685
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1118829
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1158685
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/4625
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofYeni Üroloji Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20250302
dc.subjectCircumcision
dc.subjectgeneral anesthesia
dc.subjecturinary tract infection
dc.subjectlocal anesthesia
dc.titleWhat is the best anesthesia method for circumcision? Comparison of local and general anesthesia: Prospective clinical study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4625.pdf
Boyut:
163.72 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format