Comparing the Effects of Three Different Intravitreal Injection Techniques on Vitreous Reflux and Intraocular Pressure

dc.authorid0000-0002-1940-8669
dc.authorid0000-0001-8197-2458
dc.authorid0000-0001-5435-075X
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorAlkın, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorÖzgürhan, Engin Bilge
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Ahmet Taylan
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:38:36Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the effects of straight, oblique, and double-plane tunnel scleral intravitreal injection techniques, on short-term intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, occurrence of vitreous reflux (VR), and/or other complications. Methods: A total of 105 patients were included in this prospective study. Patients were assigned randomly to one of the straight injection group (SI; n = 35), oblique injection group (OI; n = 35), or double-plane tunnel injection group (DPTI; n = 35). The occurrence of VR and preinjection and postinjection IOP at 2 and 6 h were compared between groups, and complications were assessed. Results: The mean patient age was 71.1 +/- 6.6 years (range 58 to 86 years; 50 women and 55 men). In the SI, OI, and DPTI groups, VR occurred in 18 (51.4%), 12 (34.3%), and 6 patients (17.1%), respectively. Mean preinjection IOPs were 15.4, 14.8, and 15.6 mmHg, and changed to 17.3, 18.0, and 20.0 mmHg at the second hour, and 15.7, 16.2, and 16.1 mmHg at the sixth hour, respectively. No significant differences among the groups were found in terms of complications such as transient mild uveitis or subconjunctival hemorrhage. Conclusion: Double-plane tunnel injection prevents VR from the injection site and has no additional complications than other techniques.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jop.2012.0144
dc.identifier.endpage329
dc.identifier.issn1080-7683
dc.identifier.issn1557-7732
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid23153049
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage325
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0144
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/9399
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316947100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectMacular Degeneration
dc.subjectChoroidal Neovascularization
dc.subjectFollow-Up
dc.subjectTriamcinolone
dc.subjectRanibizumab
dc.subjectSclerotomy
dc.subjectPegaptanib
dc.subjectIncision
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectEdema
dc.titleComparing the Effects of Three Different Intravitreal Injection Techniques on Vitreous Reflux and Intraocular Pressure
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
9399.pdf
Boyut:
142.2 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format