The Timing of Embryo Transfer Catheter Removal: Should It be Delayed or Done Immediately? A Prospective Randomized Trial

dc.authorid0000-0001-9730-0285
dc.contributor.authorDevranoglu, Belgin
dc.contributor.authorOzdamar, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorCakiroglu, Yigit
dc.contributor.authorKucukbas, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEken, Meryem K.
dc.contributor.authorDoger, Emek
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:41:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description32nd Annual Meeting of European-Society-of-Human-Reproduction-and-Embryology -- JUL 04-06, 2016 -- Helsinki, FINLAND
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: Data on the timing of catheter removal technique following embryo transfer (ET) are quite limited. We aimed to compare the reproductive outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/ET cycles in which the transfer catheter was removed immediately with those in which the catheter was removed after a delay period and hereby to evaluate the impact that the time interval before removal of the catheter following embryo deposit may have on the fertility outcomes. Methods: A prospective randomized study was designed. ICSI/ET patients <40 years were randomly assigned to either of the group from which catheter was withdrawn immediately within the first 5 s (Group A) or after a 30 s delay (Group B) following ET. Results: Groups A and B consisted of 147 and 148 patients, respectively. Patient demographics and stimulation characteristics were comparable between the groups. Pregnancy rate was 32.2% (95 of 295) and clinical pregnancy rate was 28.8% (85 of 295), whereas ongoing pregnancy was 24.4% (72 of 295) and implantation rate was 29.6% (100 of 338). The comparison of reproductive outcomes revealed no significant differences in pregnancy (p = 0.933), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.673), on-going pregnancy (p = 0.590), multiple pregnancy (p = 0.801), and implantation rates (p = 0.979) between the groups. Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in the reproductive outcomes between the groups; thus, there appears no requirement to delay the withdrawal of the catheter to improve the outcomes in ICSI cycles. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Soc Human Reprod & Embryol
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000460250
dc.identifier.endpage34
dc.identifier.issn0378-7346
dc.identifier.issn1423-002X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid28222446
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85013675442
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage29
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000460250
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10201
dc.identifier.volume83
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000422846700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectEmbryo transfer
dc.subjectCatheter removal
dc.subjectReproductive outcomes
dc.titleThe Timing of Embryo Transfer Catheter Removal: Should It be Delayed or Done Immediately? A Prospective Randomized Trial
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10201.pdf
Boyut:
152.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format