The Timing of Embryo Transfer Catheter Removal: Should It be Delayed or Done Immediately? A Prospective Randomized Trial
| dc.authorid | 0000-0001-9730-0285 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Devranoglu, Belgin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozdamar, Ozkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cakiroglu, Yigit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kucukbas, Mehmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eken, Meryem K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Doger, Emek | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T19:41:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description | 32nd Annual Meeting of European-Society-of-Human-Reproduction-and-Embryology -- JUL 04-06, 2016 -- Helsinki, FINLAND | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Aims: Data on the timing of catheter removal technique following embryo transfer (ET) are quite limited. We aimed to compare the reproductive outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/ET cycles in which the transfer catheter was removed immediately with those in which the catheter was removed after a delay period and hereby to evaluate the impact that the time interval before removal of the catheter following embryo deposit may have on the fertility outcomes. Methods: A prospective randomized study was designed. ICSI/ET patients <40 years were randomly assigned to either of the group from which catheter was withdrawn immediately within the first 5 s (Group A) or after a 30 s delay (Group B) following ET. Results: Groups A and B consisted of 147 and 148 patients, respectively. Patient demographics and stimulation characteristics were comparable between the groups. Pregnancy rate was 32.2% (95 of 295) and clinical pregnancy rate was 28.8% (85 of 295), whereas ongoing pregnancy was 24.4% (72 of 295) and implantation rate was 29.6% (100 of 338). The comparison of reproductive outcomes revealed no significant differences in pregnancy (p = 0.933), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.673), on-going pregnancy (p = 0.590), multiple pregnancy (p = 0.801), and implantation rates (p = 0.979) between the groups. Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in the reproductive outcomes between the groups; thus, there appears no requirement to delay the withdrawal of the catheter to improve the outcomes in ICSI cycles. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | European Soc Human Reprod & Embryol | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000460250 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 34 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0378-7346 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1423-002X | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 28222446 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85013675442 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 29 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1159/000460250 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10201 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 83 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000422846700005 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Karger | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20250302 | |
| dc.subject | Embryo transfer | |
| dc.subject | Catheter removal | |
| dc.subject | Reproductive outcomes | |
| dc.title | The Timing of Embryo Transfer Catheter Removal: Should It be Delayed or Done Immediately? A Prospective Randomized Trial | |
| dc.type | Conference Object |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1










