Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement

dc.authorid, Aybala/0000-0003-2396-7380
dc.contributor.authorKinas, Burcin Erdem
dc.contributor.authorAkagac, Arzu Etem
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Aybala Erek
dc.contributor.authorBatcik, Sule
dc.contributor.authorUras, Ahmet Riza
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement is required for intensive care patients with systemic inflammation symptoms, early diagnosis of possible infections, and evaluation of sepsis severity and prognosis. Objectives We aimed to determine the analytical performance of PCT measurement in a Roche Modular E170 (ECLIA) analyzer and compare the performance with VIDAS (BRAHMS/ELFA) analyzer findings. Material and methods Within-day and between-day precision value, linearity was determined, and two methods were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Both ECLIA and ELFA assays indicated excellent precision, where within-day precision varied between 1.18% and 3.97% CV, and between-day precision varied between 1.77% and 3.93% CV. The ECLIA method was linear up to 62.15 ng/mL. The arithmetic mean was 6.02 ng/mL with the ECLIA method and 8.02 ng/mL with the ELFA method. The correlation coefficient was r=0.996 and p=0.001. The correlation was linear between the two methods. Regression equation was found y=0.78x - 0.23. The Bland-Altman figure was revealed the difference between the methods was specifically in lower concentrations (<0.15 ng/mL). Conclusions Both methods show good precision and correlation. It was determined that the difference between methods was significant, especially at <0.15 ng/mL concentration.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
dc.identifier.endpage22
dc.identifier.issn0250-4685
dc.identifier.issn1303-829X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126328161
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage19
dc.identifier.trdizinid1171743
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1171743
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13420
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000740003900002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter De Gruyter Gmbh
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Biochemistry-Turk Biyokimya Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectcomparison
dc.subjectelectrochemiluminescence
dc.subjectfluorescent assay
dc.subjectprocalcitonin
dc.subjectsepsis
dc.titleComparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar