Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: A prospective fellow eye study

dc.authorid0000-0001-8197-2458
dc.authorid0000-0001-5435-075X
dc.authorid0000-0002-1940-8669
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.contributor.authorÖzgürhan, Engin Bilge
dc.contributor.authorDemirok, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ercument
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Ilker
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:54Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) between eyes treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK). Setting: Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital. Design: Prospective comparative case series. Methods: Sixty eyes from 30 patients with bilateral myopia or myopic astigmatism were studied. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent of subjective manifest refraction (SE) <10 diopters (D) and a difference <= 0.50 D between the SEs of both eyes. One eye of each patient was treated with SMILE, and the fellow eye underwent femto-LASIK. Randomization was performed using a sealed envelope system. The main outcome measures were CH and CRF measured preoperatively and postoperatively (1 and 6 months). Results: Preoperative SE was similar in both groups (p = 0.852). CH and CRF values were reduced postoperatively in both groups compared to their corresponding preoperative values (p < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up visit, the mean CH values in the SMILE and femto-LASIK groups were 8.95 +/- 1.47 and 9.02 +/- 1.27, respectively (p = 0.852), and the mean CRF values were 7.77 +/- 1.37 and 8.07 +/- 1.26, respectively (p = 0.380). Conclusion: CH and CRF decreased after SMILE. There were no differences between SMILE and femto-LASIK treatments in postoperative CH or CRF values. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Contact Lens Association. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2013.05.003
dc.identifier.endpage80
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484
dc.identifier.issn1476-5411
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid23830802
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84894653882
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage77
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2013.05.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11862
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333444200003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.relation.ispartofContact Lens & Anterior Eye
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectSmall incision lenticule extraction
dc.subjectSMILE
dc.subjectLASIK
dc.subjectCorneal hysteresis
dc.subjectCorneal resistance factor
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.titleComparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: A prospective fellow eye study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar