The Mw=5.8 2019 Silivri earthquake, NW Turkiye: is it a warning beacon for a big one?

dc.authorid0000-0002-7944-5912
dc.authorid0000-0001-5319-1048
dc.contributor.authorUtkucu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorUzunca, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorNalbant, Sueleyman Sami
dc.contributor.authorIpek, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorRamazanoglu, Sefik
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe September 26, 2019 Silivri earthquake (M-W = 5.8) occurred along the North Anatolian Fault beneath the Marmara Sea and its epicenter was in an identified seismic gap. Coseismic stress calculations demonstrate that the 1999 Izmit earthquake (M-W = 7.4) caused stress increase from 0.057 to 0.114 bars at its hypocenter, depending on the various reported rupture parameters. In addition, over 20 years following the 1999 earthquake, and constituting the main difference from previous studies, viscoelastic postseismic stress computations indicate stress increase from 0.081 to 0.135 bars at the hypocenter. In spite of the positive stress transfer, the 2019 earthquake occurred long after the end of the computed aftershock time span (similar to 16 years) of the 1999 earthquake. Plots of the seismicity around selected points within the gap also show that the background seismicity level following the 1999 earthquake was reached in 2003. Therefore, it is suggested that the 2019 earthquake was not an aftershock but rather an independent event, and its occurrence was hastened about 4 years due to stress loading. Further analysis of the seismicity between 1978 and 2020 indicates that the b value increased from a range of 1.0-1.1 to 1.6-1.8 till 2002, then progressively decreased to 0.9-1.0, which is consistent with positive stress transfer. The stress increase ranging from 0.19 to 2.52 bars on the segments within the gap brought forward their seismic cycles about 33 and 2 years from east to west, respectively. These additional clock advances in the seismic cycles due to stress load urgently require risk mitigating actions.
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arascedil;timath;rma Kurumu [121Y271]
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Ara & scedil;t & imath;rma Kurumu, 121Y271, Murat Utkucu.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00531-023-02359-6
dc.identifier.issn1437-3254
dc.identifier.issn1437-3262
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176756466
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-023-02359-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13139
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001105137000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Earth Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectThe North Anatolian fault
dc.subjectThe 1999 Izmit earthquake
dc.subjectThe 26 September 2019 Silivri earthquake
dc.subjectEarthquake stress interactions
dc.subjectTime dependent stress changes
dc.subjectThe main Marmara fault
dc.subjectPrinces Islands fault segment
dc.titleThe Mw=5.8 2019 Silivri earthquake, NW Turkiye: is it a warning beacon for a big one?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13139
Boyut:
4.73 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format