Evaluation of Corneal Microstructure in Keratoconus: A Confocal Microscopy Study

dc.authorid0000-0001-8197-2458
dc.authorid0000-0001-8113-6206
dc.contributor.authorÖzgürhan, Engin Bilge
dc.contributor.authorKara, Necip
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ercument
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Hasim
dc.contributor.authorDemirok, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare the corneal microstructure in patients with manifest keratoconus (KCN), subclinical KCN, and topographically normal relatives of patients with KCN and in healthy controls. DESIGN: Prospective and cross-sectional study. METHODS: We enrolled 145 subjects in the study. The participants were divided into 4 groups, based on clinical and topographical evaluation: the manifest KCN group (n = 30), the subclinical KCN group (n = 32), the KCN relatives group (n = 53), and the control group (n = 30). Corneal microstructure was assessed by corneal in vivo confocal microscopy in all of the individuals. Mean outcome measures were basal epithelial cell density, endothelial cell density, anterior keratocyte density, posterior keratocyte density, sub-basal nerve density, sub-basal nerve diameter, and stromal nerve diameter. RESULTS: The mean basal epithelial cell density, endothelial cell density, and sub-basal nerve diameter were not significantly different among the 4 groups (P = 0.057, P = 0.592, and P = 0.393, respectively). The mean anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte densities were significantly lower in the manifest group, in the subclinical group, and in the relatives group when compared with the control group (for both parameters; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The mean stromal nerve diameter in the manifest group, subclinical group, and relatives group was significantly higher than in the control group (P = 0.001, P = 0.049, and P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: The anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte densities were statistically lower and stromal nerve diameter was statistically higher in patients with manifest KCN, subclinical KCN, and topographically normal KCN relatives compared with controls. Confocal microscopy may be useful for the determination of early corneal microstructural changes before manifestation of typical or subtle topographic signs. (C) 2013 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.043
dc.identifier.endpage893
dc.identifier.issn0002-9394
dc.identifier.issn1879-1891
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid23932262
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84886102096
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage885
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11697
dc.identifier.volume156
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000326859200005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectIn-Situ-Keratomileusis
dc.subjectRisk-Factors
dc.subjectVivo
dc.subjectEctasia
dc.subjectKeratectasia
dc.subjectInnervation
dc.subjectRelatives
dc.subjectDensity
dc.subjectLasik
dc.subjectSensitivity
dc.titleEvaluation of Corneal Microstructure in Keratoconus: A Confocal Microscopy Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar