Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Regimens in the Treatment of Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome

dc.authorid0000-0003-1257-6843
dc.authorid0000-0001-9680-6268
dc.contributor.authorGur, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorKaragullu, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorAltindag, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorMadenci, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorTutoglu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBoyaci, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two different regimens of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Patients and methods: Sixty four patients with active myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle were included in this study. Patients were randomized into two groups as patients undergoing a single session of low-energy [energy flux density (ED=0.25 mJ/mm(2))] ESWT (group 1) and patients undergoing three sessions of ESWT with the same energy density, with one-week intervals (group 2). The effectiveness of therapy was evaluated using the number of trigger points, the Patient Global Assessment and Physician Global Assessment scales, the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, the Nottingham Health Profile and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale prior to therapy and at the end of three and 12 weeks. Results: No serious complication associated with ESWT application was observed. At the end of the treatment, statistically significant improvements were achieved in the number of trigger points, pain, quality of life, and anxiety scores of patients in both groups (p<0.01). When the groups were compared regarding the effectiveness of the treatment, the improvements in the group receiving three sessions of ESWT were higher except for the anxiety scores (p<0.05). Conclusion: Low-energy ESWT is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for patients with myofascial pain syndrome and can be more efficient when administered as a three-session treatment regimen.
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2014.3738
dc.identifier.endpage193
dc.identifier.issn2148-5046
dc.identifier.issn1309-0283
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage186
dc.identifier.trdizinid168449
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2014.3738
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/168449
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13663
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000345820700007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish League Against Rheumatism
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Rheumatology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectExtracorporeal shock wave therapy
dc.subjectmyofascial pain syndrome
dc.subjecttrigger point
dc.titleComparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Regimens in the Treatment of Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13663.pdf
Boyut:
246.26 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format