Incomplete-Rural Society and Complete-City Society in Ancient Greek and Islamic Political Thought

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Beytulhikme Felsefe Cevresi

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

The subject of this article is the distinction between incomplete-rural society and complete-city society in Aristotle and Islamic political thought. Incomplete society and complete society belong to Aristotle and the Islamic political philosophy. The distinction between rural society and city society is based on Ibn Khaldun. The problem of the article is to analyze the views of Aristotle, Islamic political philosophy and Ibn Khaldun regarding the goals and means of the incomplete-rural society and the complete-city society. There is a similarity between the views of Aristotle, Islamic political philosophy and Ibn Khaldun regarding the goal and means of the incomplete-rural society. The complete society in Aristotle and Islamic political philosophy express two different designs, although they have some similarities in terms of goal and means. Ibn Khaldun has an approach that is different from both Aristotle's and Islamic political philosophy's theory regarding the goal and means of city society.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Political thought, rural society, city society, good life, happiness

Kaynak

Beytulhikme-An International Journal of Philosophy

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

15

Sayı

3

Künye

Onay

İnceleme

Ekleyen

Referans Veren