Accelerated corneal crosslinking concurrent with laser in situ keratomileusis

dc.authorid0000-0001-8197-2458
dc.authorid0000-0002-4161-0919
dc.authorid0000-0001-5435-075X
dc.contributor.authorCelik, H. Ugur
dc.contributor.authorAlagoz, Nese
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, John
dc.contributor.authorDemirok, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Omer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:50:06Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To assess accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) applied concurrently with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in a small group of patients. SETTING: Beyoglu Eye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. DESIGN: Prospective pilot interventional case series. METHODS: In May 2010, patients had LASIK with concurrent accelerated CXL in 1 eye and LASIK only in the fellow eye to treat myopia or myopic astigmatism. The follow-up was 12 months. The attempted correction (spherical equivalent) ranged from -5.00 to -8.50 diopters (D) in the LASIK CXL group and from -3.00 to -7.25 D in the LASIK-only group. Main outcome measures were manifest refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, and the endothelial cell count. RESULTS: Eight eyes of 3 women and 1 man (age 22 to 39 years old) were enrolled. At the 12-month follow-up, the LASIK CXL group had a UDVA and manifest refraction equal to or better than those in the LASIK-only group. No eye lost 1 or more lines of CDVA at the final visit. The endothelial cell loss in the LASIK CXL eye was not greater than in the fellow eye. No side effects were associated with either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis with accelerated CXL appears to be a promising modality for future applications to prevent corneal ectasia after LASIK treatment. The results in this pilot series suggest that evaluation of a larger study cohort is warranted. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Yilmaz and Marshall are paid consultants to Avedro, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38:1424-1431 (C) 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS
dc.description.sponsorshipAvedro, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by grants from Avedro, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.034
dc.identifier.endpage1431
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid22814049
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1424
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12252
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307322700019
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectEctasia
dc.subjectKeratoconus
dc.subjectKeratectasia
dc.subjectRisk
dc.subjectLasik
dc.subjectRiboflavin
dc.subjectRegression
dc.titleAccelerated corneal crosslinking concurrent with laser in situ keratomileusis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar