Determining the cut-off values of tumor diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension, and extent of surgical margin positivity with regard to biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

dc.authorid0000-0002-3613-0523
dc.authorid0000-0002-5046-7536
dc.contributor.authorKır, Gözde
dc.contributor.authorArikan, Evsen Apaydin
dc.contributor.authorSeneldir, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorAnkaralı, Handan
dc.contributor.authorOznergiz, Seca
dc.contributor.authorOlgun, Zeynep Çağla
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Asıf
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİMÜ, Fakülteler, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: The pre-biopsy (bx) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, tumor volume/diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and extent of surgical margin positivity have been shown to be significant prognostic parameters of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. The present study assessed the cut-off values of the pre-bx PSA level, maximum tumor diameter, radial and circumferential distances of EPE, and circumferential length of surgical margin (SM) positivity with regard to BCR. Material and methods: The study included 445 radical prostatectomy specimens, and the cut-off values of all parameters were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: An ISUP grade group >= 3, radial distance of EPE > 1 mm, and circumferential length of SM positivity >= 2 mm were identified as independent predictors of BCR after radical prostatectomy. The parameters that showed statistical significance in univariate analysis, such as pre-bx PSA level >= 7.20 ng/mL, tumor diameter >= 19.5 mm, presence of seminal vesicle invasion, and circumferential distance of EPE > 3 mm, did not have independent prognostic values for BCR. Conclusions: An ISUP grade group >= 3, radial distance of EPE > 1 mm, and circumferential length of SM positivity >= 2 mm are predictors of BCR. Our findings might have significance in risk classification and adjuvant therapy consideration among patients with localized prostate cancer.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.151431
dc.identifier.issn1092-9134
dc.identifier.issn1532-8198
dc.identifier.pmid31837592
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076236498
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.151431
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11727
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000514476800005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Diagnostic Pathology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectProstate cancer
dc.subjectBiochemical recurrence
dc.subjectExtraprostatic extension
dc.subjectMaximum tumor diameter
dc.subjectSurgical margin positivity
dc.titleDetermining the cut-off values of tumor diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension, and extent of surgical margin positivity with regard to biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar