Prolongation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Surgery: Seeking the Optimal Number of Cycles in Serous Ovarian Cancer

dc.contributor.authorMinareci, Yagmur
dc.contributor.authorSozen, Hamdullah
dc.contributor.authorAk, Naziye
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Ozgur A.
dc.contributor.authorSaip, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorSalihoglu, M. Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorTopuz, Samet
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:41:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) cycles is unclear in epithelial ovarian cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of the number of NACT cycles before interval debulking surgery on survival. Methods: Data of 221 patients with advanced-stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into groups as who received 3 cycles of NACT (group A), 4-5 cycles of NACT (group B), and 6 cycles of NACT (group C). Results: There were 67 (30%) patients in group A, 70 (32%) in group B, and 84 (38%) in group C. Median overall survival (OS) was 61 (range 43-79) months for group A, 44 (range 36-52) months for group B, and 39 (range 27-50) months for group C. In addition, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 23.1 (range 8.5-32.1) months for group A, 19.2 (range 10.1-28.4) months for group B, and 21.5 (range 16-27) months for group C. Patients receiving >3 NACT cycles had worse OS than patients who received 3 NACT cycles (for group A vs. B, p = 0.018; for group A vs. C, p = 0.049). However, in terms of DFS, patients receiving 3 NACT cycles had no statistically significant difference compared to patients who received >3 NACT cycles. Conclusions: Patients with advanced-stage serous EOC who received more than 3 cycles of NACT had poor OS. However, there was no statistical difference in terms of DFS. In addition, >3 cycles of NACT did not increase the probability of achieving complete cytoreduction at the time of surgery.
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000519615
dc.identifier.endpage11
dc.identifier.issn0009-3157
dc.identifier.issn1421-9794
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid34784598
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120318650
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000519615
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10215
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000721618900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofChemotherapy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectNumber of cycles
dc.subjectInterval debulking surgery
dc.subjectEpithelial ovarian cancer
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemotherapy
dc.titleProlongation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Surgery: Seeking the Optimal Number of Cycles in Serous Ovarian Cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar