Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with Split Corneal Grafts: The Influence of Tamponade Material and Endothelial Storage Time

dc.authorid0000-0002-9948-5575
dc.authorid0000-0001-5435-075X
dc.authorid0000-0003-4091-7094
dc.authorid0000-0002-4161-0919
dc.authorid0000-0003-3049-2571
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Selim
dc.contributor.authorAygun, Beril Tulu
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Fehim
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:45:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical outcome of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed with split corneal grafts and to evaluate the influence of tamponade material and endothelial storage time on DMEK success. Material and Method: The records of 43 patients who underwent DMEK surgery with a split corneal graft were reviewed. Diagnosis of the patients, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal and endothelial storage time, tamponade material, complications, and success rates were specifically tabulated. Results: The most common indication for DMEK was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 25, 58.2%). Re-bubbling was needed in 10 cases (23.2%), and a re-DMEK was scheduled in 2 cases and penetrating keratoplasty in 4 cases (9.3%). BCVA improved significantly postoperatively (p < .001). There was an insignificant trend towards a lower re-bubbling rate and better long-term anatomic outcome in favor of 20% SF6 group compared to air tamponade (p = .18 and p = .25). There was no significant difference between the early endothelial transplant (<24 h) and delayed endothelial transplant (3 to 14 days) groups for anatomic success, corneal thickness or BCVA (p = .94, p = .13 and p = .35). Conclusion: The success rate of DMEK was satisfactory with split corneal grafts. There was no adverse influence of delayed endothelial transplantation on clinical outcome. The success rate of 20% SF6 tamponade was slightly better than room air.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08820538.2019.1648690
dc.identifier.endpage463
dc.identifier.issn0882-0538
dc.identifier.issn1744-5205
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid31354011
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070347131
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage458
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2019.1648690
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11118
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000478411500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofSeminars in Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectDelayed endothelial graft
dc.subjectDescemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty
dc.subjectDMEK
dc.subjectSF6 tamponade
dc.subjectsplit corneal transplantation
dc.titleDescemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with Split Corneal Grafts: The Influence of Tamponade Material and Endothelial Storage Time
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar