A Comparison of Charles Taylor and Talal Asad on the Issue of Secularity SHARE

Abstract

Talal Asad and Charles Taylor have been thinking and writing about secularism for at least one decade. Their works are widely read, discussed, and admired. They, by andlarge, constitute the contemporary framework of discussion for those interested in issues revolving around secularization, secularism, and the secular, which althoughare terms that refer to distinctive phenomena, are often misused as if they are either the same or simply aspects of the same process. However, these two scholars still hold significantly different, if not mutually contradictory, ideas about secularism. The aim of this article is not to provide a summary of their thoughts on secularism, but rather, to compare and contrast their critically different approaches to the issue of secularism. In this regard, this article argues that an unbridgeable gap exists between Asad’s and Taylor’s approaches to and engagements with the secular. This article first covers Taylor’s and then Asad’s approach and method through a close reading of Taylor’sA Secular Age, and Asad’s Genealogies of Religion, Formations of the Secular, and the edited volume on him, Powers of the Secular Modern

Talal Asad and Charles Taylor have been thinking and writing about secularism for at least one decade. Their works are widely read, discussed, and admired. They, by andlarge, constitute the contemporary framework of discussion for those interested in issues revolving around secularization, secularism, and the secular, which althoughare terms that refer to distinctive phenomena, are often misused as if they are either the same or simply aspects of the same process. However, these two scholars still hold significantly different, if not mutually contradictory, ideas about secularism. The aim of this article is not to provide a summary of their thoughts on secularism, but rather, to compare and contrast their critically different approaches to the issue of secularism. In this regard, this article argues that an unbridgeable gap exists between Asad’s and Taylor’s approaches to and engagements with the secular. This article first covers Taylor’s and then Asad’s approach and method through a close reading of Taylor’sA Secular Age, and Asad’s Genealogies of Religion, Formations of the Secular, and the edited volume on him, Powers of the Secular Modern