Does primary tumor localization has prognostic importance in seminoma patients?: Turkish Oncology Group Study

dc.authorid0000-0002-9152-9887
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Birol
dc.contributor.authorKucukarda, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGokyer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorDemiray, Atike Gokcen
dc.contributor.authorPaydas, Semra
dc.contributor.authorAral, Ipek Pinar
dc.contributor.authorGumusay, Ozge
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:28:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary tumor localization may be a risk factor for relapse and survival in seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) patients. Methods: In our study, 612 seminomatous GCT patients diagnosed in 22 centers between 01.01.1989 and 03.02.2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system data were used for the study. Results: The primary tumor was localized in the right testis in 305 (49.9%) patients and in 307 (50.1%) in the left testis. Mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 16-85 +/- 10.4). The median follow-up period was 47 months (1-298). Recurrence was observed in 78 (127%) patients and 29 (4.7%) died during the follow-up period. Four-year overall survival (OS) was 95.4% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. The relationship between localization and relapse was significant in 197 patients with stage 2 and stage 3 (p=0.003). In this patient group, 41 (20.8%) relapses were observed. Thirty (73.2%) of the relapses were in the right testis and 11 (26.8%) in the left testis. Four-year OS was 92.1% in patients with right tumor; and 98.7% in patients with left tumor (p=0.007). When 612 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was a 6.6% survival advantage in patients with left testicular tumor and this difference was significant (p=0.007). Conclusion: Survival rates of patients with primary right testicular localization were worse compared with left testicular localization, and relapse rates were higher in stage 2 and 3 patients with right testicular localization.
dc.identifier.endpage1135
dc.identifier.issn1107-0625
dc.identifier.issn2241-6293
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid32521916
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085148078
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage1130
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/7261
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000549861000019
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherImprimatur Publications
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Buon
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjecttesticular cancer
dc.subjectgerm cell tumor
dc.subjectseminoma
dc.subjectprimary tumor localization
dc.subjectprognosis
dc.subjectsurvey
dc.titleDoes primary tumor localization has prognostic importance in seminoma patients?: Turkish Oncology Group Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
7261
Boyut:
1.09 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format