High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has an impact on myeloma outcome: Lower HDL associates with worse progression-free survival

dc.authorid0000-0002-5289-7134
dc.authorid0000-0002-1559-8047
dc.authorid0000-0002-0944-4068
dc.contributor.authorOzunal, Isil Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorKilicaslan, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorElibol, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Erman
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:54:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) staging is based on beta-2 MG, albumin, LDH levels, and the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. We aimed to evaluate the impact of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on myeloma outcomes.Materials and methodsThis study included 148 individuals; 68 patients diagnosed with MM and 80 age, sex, comorbidity-matched controls. The relationship between HDL and myeloma stage and the association between HDL and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.ResultsSixty-five percent of patients were male in each group. Mean HDL level was higher in the control group than myeloma group (52.6 & PLUSMN; 15.02 mg/dl versus 33.79 & PLUSMN; 12.71) (p < 0.001). According to ISS, 39 patients (57%) had advanced stage (ISS-III) disease. To assess the optimal cut-point for HDL that makes a difference in PFS, the X-tile software program was used and in line with the created plots, the myeloma cohort was divided into two groups as HDL < 28 and & GE; 28 mg/dl. Twenty-two patients (32.4%) were in HDL < 28 group. According to the ISS, HDL < 28 group had more advanced disease than the HDL & GE; 28 group (p = 0.008). Twenty-nine patients (42.6%) progressed or died during the follow-up and 15 of these were in the HDL < 28 group. Time to progression was shorter in patients who were in the HDL < 28 group (median, 22 versus 40 months, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of overall survival (p = 0.708).ConclusionMyeloma patients have lower HDL than controls and HDL < 28 mg/dl associates with advanced-stage disease and shorter PFS. Therefore, HDL can be a surrogate prognostic marker in myeloma.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00508-023-02239-8
dc.identifier.endpage404
dc.identifier.issn0043-5325
dc.identifier.issn1613-7671
dc.identifier.issue13-14
dc.identifier.pmid37402933
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163994537
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage398
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02239-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13134
dc.identifier.volume136
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001025655000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Wien
dc.relation.ispartofWiener Klinische Wochenschrift
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectMultiple myeloma
dc.subjectHigh-density lipoprotein
dc.subjectStage
dc.subjectProgression-free survival
dc.titleHigh-density lipoprotein (HDL) has an impact on myeloma outcome: Lower HDL associates with worse progression-free survival
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13134
Boyut:
655.21 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format