Prognostic Impacts of the Localization and Diameter of Breast Cancer Axillary Micrometastasis

dc.authorid0000-0003-2935-8463
dc.authorid0000-0001-7651-4321
dc.authorid0000-0002-2020-1913
dc.authorid0000-0003-0470-1683
dc.authorid0000-0003-3604-6177
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorEren, Tunç
dc.contributor.authorGacemer, Mert
dc.contributor.authorGunel, Humeyra
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Begumhan
dc.contributor.authorBuyuker, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Mehmet Sait
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:47:58Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe prognostic importance of breast cancer axillary micrometastases is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the features of the micrometastases on recurrence and survival. Surgically treated breast cancer patients who were detected to harbor axillary micrometastasis were divided into subgroups as sinusoidal and intranodal and 0.2-1 mm and 1-2 mm according to the localization and size of the micrometastases, respectively. The association of micrometastasic features on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was statistically analyzed. Thirty-three women with a mean age of 58.2 SD13.3 (range: 20-95) years were included. The median follow-up period was 50 (interquartile range: 30-62) months. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 27 (81.8%) and axillary dissection in 6 (18.2%) patients. The rate of intranodal micrometastasis of 1-2 mm diameter was higher than the other subgroups. Although the patients with a 1-2 mm diameter micrometastasis had an increased risk of distant metastasis development (hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI: 12.3, 1.2-126.0; p=0.035), tumor localization was not found to affect DFS (HR, 95% CI: 5.60, 0.55-57.10; p=0.15). The DFS of the group with a 0.2-1 mm diameter micrometastasis was found to be longer than the group with a micrometastasis of 1-2 mm diameter. Survival analysis revaled that OS was not affected by either the localization or the size of the micrometastases according to the comparisons of the study subgroups. We consider that the size of axillary micrometastasis poses importance during the follow-up of surgically treated breast cancer patients in terms of distant metastasis development.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12262-023-03888-9
dc.identifier.endpage1449
dc.identifier.issn0972-2068
dc.identifier.issn0973-9793
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85167664096
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage1441
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03888-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11564
dc.identifier.volume85
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001046031100002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer India
dc.relation.ispartofIndian Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectBreast neoplasms
dc.subjectAxilla
dc.subjectMicrometastasis
dc.subjectDistant metastasis
dc.titlePrognostic Impacts of the Localization and Diameter of Breast Cancer Axillary Micrometastasis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar