Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?

dc.authorid0000-0001-8573-1192
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Turgay
dc.contributor.authorEfioglu, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorDanacioglu, Yavuz Onur
dc.contributor.authorSendogan, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorCulpan, Meftun
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorAtış, Ramazan Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:31:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Managing upper ureteral stones with shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been done for many years. However, no conclusive data have been found on the intervals required between repeated SWL sessions. Aim: To identify the most optimal intervals between SWL sessions. Material and methods: Between September 2015 and December 2016, 80 patients undergoing elective outpatient lithotripsy who required repeated SWL sessions for ureteral stones were evaluated. These patients were categorised into two groups according to different SWL session intervals. The intervals between SWL sessions (n = 40) for the first group lasted one day, whereas those for the second group (n = 40) lasted 1 week. The data recorded during SWL included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, total number of shocks, total energy used and number of sessions. The stone clearance rates, number of urinary tract infections, complication rates and VAS scores were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients' clinical outcomes after SWL therapy are shown in Table I. The stone clearance rate for group 1 was 70%, whereas that for group 2 was 72.5% (p = 0.805). Additionally, the number of urinary tract infections, complications and VAS scores were similar for both groups. In group 1, 3 patients had steinstrasse, two suffered from severe renal colic, and one had a urinary tract infection. In group 2, 3 patients endured steinstrasse, and 2 patients experienced severe renal colic during the study. Conclusions: Short-interval SWL sessions are safe and effective for treating upper ureteral stones, and such sessions do not increase complication rates.
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/wiitm.2018.75873
dc.identifier.endpage511
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588
dc.identifier.issn2299-0054
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid30524622
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057715421
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage507
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.75873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/7992
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000451643700012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofVideosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectshock wave lithotripsy
dc.subjectupper ureteral stones
dc.subjectrepeat sessions
dc.titleCan intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
75.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format