Visual Outcomes, Endothelial Loss, and Complications Following Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation and Trocar-Assisted Sutureless Scleral Fixation of Intraocular Lenses

dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Ebubekir
dc.contributor.authorAykut, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorHepokur, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSali, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorSanisoglu, Huseyin Avni
dc.contributor.authorOğuz, Halit
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Fehim
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T15:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Iris-claw intraocular lens (IC-IOL) implantation and sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses (SSF-IOL) are two commonly preferred surgical approaches for the management of aphakic patients without sufficient capsular support. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of IC-IOL implantation and trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation. Methods: The medical records of secondary IOL implantation patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a detailed ophthalmological examination, including LogMAR best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and endothelial cell density (ECD) preoperatively and postoperatively. SPSS 21.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. Results: There were 15 patients in the IC-IOL group and 12 patients in the SSF-IOL group. Age and gender distributions were similar between the groups (p=0.456 and p=0.398, respectively). Similarly, patients in both groups had similar CDVA preoperatively and postoperatively (p=0.51, p=0.48, respectively). Both IC-IOL and SSF-IOL implantation significantly increased CDVA (p=0.001 and p=0.005, respectively). IOP remained unchanged in both groups. However, ECD reduced significantly following both IC-IOL and SSF-IOL implantation (p=0.001 and p=0.005, respectively) and trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation resulted in significantly more endothelial loss compared to IC-IOL implantation (439.5±89 vs. 164.4±53, p=0.013). Conclusion: Both surgical approaches increased CDVA significantly and at similar levels. However, trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation resulted in significantly more endothelial loss compared to IC-IOL implantation. None of the patients developed bullous keratopathy, but this difference should be kept in mind, especially in patients with critically low ECD. © 2023 Kare Publishing. All rights reserved
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/bej.2023.30085
dc.identifier.endpage259
dc.identifier.issn2459-1777
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179398077
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage253
dc.identifier.trdizinid1256244
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2023.30085
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1256244
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6750
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKare Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofBeyoglu Eye Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250302
dc.subjectEndothelial loss; implantation; iris-claw intraocular lens; secondary intraocular lens; sutureless scleral fixation
dc.titleVisual Outcomes, Endothelial Loss, and Complications Following Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation and Trocar-Assisted Sutureless Scleral Fixation of Intraocular Lenses
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6750.pdf
Boyut:
356.91 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format