Comparison of general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations

dc.contributor.authorKisa, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorKoruk, Senem
dc.contributor.authorKocoglu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorLeblebici, İhsan Metin
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T15:24:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) operations are being performed under general anesthesia (GA). Further studies are needed on the issue whether these operations can be performed under spinal anesthesia (SA). In this study we aimed to compare SA with (GA) in terms of efficacy and complications in patients who will undergo LC operations, and to investigate the effects of preemptive analgesia on the development of shoulder pain, transition to general anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia. Method: Sixty patients in ASA I-II risk group between 18-65 years of age undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into general anesthesia (GA, n=30) and spinal anesthesia (SA, n=30) groups. Patients were premedicated with i.v. midazolam and fentanyl preoperatively. Anesthesia was induced with propofol in the GA group, and maintained with Desflurane and remifentanil. In the SA group, spinal anesthesia was provided with intratechal administration of 15 mg bupivacaine at L2-3 level, and block level was increased to T4 by keeping the patient in Trendelenburg position for 7-10 minutes. Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 0th,1st, 4th, 8th,12th and 24th hours, patient-surgeon satisfaction, side effects, and occurrence of right shoulder pain in SA group were inquired and recorded. Results: Effective anesthesia was produced in both groups. Hypotension was observed in 5, bradycardia requiring atropin administration in 4, and perioperative shoulder pain in 9 patients in Group SA, but none of them required general anesthesia. Hypotension developed in one patient in Group GA. The postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower in Group SA at 0th,1st, 4th hours. Patient satisfection scores were higher in Group SA. Conclusion: We concluded that spinal anesthesia may be an alternative method to general anesthesia in patients who will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations especially when the risk of general anesthesia is too high. © Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine.
dc.description.sponsorshipIstanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, (2016/0223)
dc.identifier.doi10.5222/MMJ.2019.37929
dc.identifier.endpage353
dc.identifier.issn2149-2042
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85077579817
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage346
dc.identifier.trdizinid383692
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2019.37929
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/383692
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6817
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLogos Medical Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofMedeniyet Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250302
dc.subjectGeneral anesthesia; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Postoperative pain; Spinal anesthesia; Surgeon satisfaction
dc.titleComparison of general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations
dc.title.alternativeLaparoskopik kolesistektomi ameliyatlarında genel anestezi ile spinal anestezinin karşılaştırılması
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6817.pdf
Boyut:
286 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format