Switching Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Multicenter Experience

dc.authorid0000-0003-1376-1573
dc.contributor.authorOzkur, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorKivanc Altunay, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorOguz Topal, Ilteris
dc.contributor.authorAytekin, Sema
dc.contributor.authorTopaloglu Demir, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorOzkok Akbulut, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorKara Polat, Asude
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:41:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: The purpose of our study was to provide evidence on the treatment choices, reasons, and results of switching between biologic agents in treating patients with psoriasis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective database search of six tertiary referral centers for pso-riasis patients between January 2007 and May 2019. We analyzed patient and treatment characteristics of all patients in the registry. Results: We enrolled 427 psoriatic patients treated with biologics, and 145 (34%) required a switch to another biologic. The reasons for discontinuing the first biologic agent were inefficacy (n = 106, 62.4%), adverse events (n = 28, 16.5%), and others (n = 36, 21.2%). At week 12, there was a 67.7% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of patients treated with their first biologic, and 51.4% reduction for the second. A drug survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the drug survival of first-line biologic agents, but ustekinumab had the highest survival rate among second-line biologics (log-rank p = 0.010). Multivariate analyses for overall drug discontinuation showed that the occurrence of psoriatic arthritis (OR: 1.883, 95% CI: 1.274-2.782, p = 0.001), nail involvement (OR: 2.334, 95% CI: 1.534-3.552, p < 0.001), and use of concomitant treatment (OR: 2.303, 95% CI: 1.403 -3.780, p = 0.001) are predictors for discontinuation. Conclusion: Discontinuation of treatment was most commonly due to inefficacy. Patients who switched to a different biologic agent showed a similar improvement in PASI scores compared to biologic-naive patients. Switching to a second biologic therapy due to inefficacy or adverse events caused by the first one may improve psoriasis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000504839
dc.identifier.endpage30
dc.identifier.issn1018-8665
dc.identifier.issn1421-9832
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid31865339
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076800614
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage22
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000504839
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10210
dc.identifier.volume237
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000609462100005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofDermatology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectPsoriasis
dc.subjectBiologic
dc.subjectInfliximab
dc.subjectEtanercept
dc.subjectAdalimumab
dc.subjectUstekinumab
dc.subjectSecukinumab
dc.titleSwitching Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Multicenter Experience
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10210.pdf
Boyut:
311.92 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format