Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Affecting Cochlear Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

dc.authorid0000-0002-3613-0523
dc.authorid0000-0003-3318-3555
dc.authorid0000-0002-6803-5467
dc.authorid0000-0003-2490-9449
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, Başak
dc.contributor.authorEser, Mehmet Bilgin
dc.contributor.authorKalcıoğlu, Mahmut Tayyar
dc.contributor.authorAnkaralı, Handan
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:53:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİMÜ, Fakülteler, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the cochlea's average size in humans and evaluate the relationships between certain covariates and cochlear size. Methods: A systematic search on articles on cochlear size and published in English was conducted using Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to September 15, 2020. Data were pooled using random-effects with three models. The effect of demographic, clinical, and measurement-related parameters was specifically analyzed. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted. The overall effect estimation was made for outcomes. Results: The meta-analysis included 4,708 cochleae from 56 studies. The overall length of the organ of Corti was 32.94 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.51-33.38). The first and second models revealed that age, gender, country, continent, measurement method (direct, indirect), measured structure (A value, cochlear lateral wall), origin (in vivo, in vitro), and type (histology specimens, plastic casts, imaging) of the cochlear material did not affect the cochlear size. However, study populations (general population, patients with a cochlear implant, and patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss [CSNHL]) were found to affect the outcomes. Compared to the other populations, patients with CSNHL had shorter cochleae. Therefore, we developed a third model and found that the general population and patients with cochlear implants did not differ in cochlear size. Conclusion: This meta-analysis investigated the factors that could affect the cochlear size and found that patients with CSNHL had significantly shorter cochleae, whereas other covariates had no significant effect.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lary.29532
dc.identifier.endpage197
dc.identifier.issn0023-852X
dc.identifier.issn1531-4995
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid33764541
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103211432
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage188
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29532
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12853
dc.identifier.volume132
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000632488600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofLaryngoscope
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectCochlea size
dc.subjecthumankind
dc.subjectcochlear lateral wall length
dc.subjectorgan of Corti
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.titleComprehensive Analysis of Factors Affecting Cochlear Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
12853
Boyut:
1.15 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format