Usefulness of triglyceride-glucose index and homeostatic model assessment for predicting coronary microvascular dysfunction

dc.authorid0000-0002-5267-1602
dc.authorid0000-0002-6676-2740
dc.authorid0000-0002-6738-266X
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Fatma Betul
dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Tolga Sinan
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzyildirim, Serhan
dc.contributor.authorGocer, Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:50:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common occurrence in individuals with insulin resistance (IR). Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a widely used surrogate marker of IR, although recent studies suggest triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a superior marker of IR that had a better accuracy to predict type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular outcomes than HOMA-IR. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the accuracy and usefulness of TyG index and HOMA-IR for predicting CMD as assessed with echocardiographic coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement. METHODS: All cases included in the institutional CFR registry were retrospectively reviewed, and 656 cases without epicardial coronary artery disease and without major risk factors for atherosclerosis were included. A CFR <= 2.0 was defined as CMD. RESULTS: TyG index was available in all cases, while HOMA-IR was available in 398 cases. Both TyG index and HOMA-IR were associated with CMD on univariate analyses, while after adjustment for potential confounders HOMA-IR (odds ratio [OR]:1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.14-1.67, p = 0.001) but not TyG index (OR:1.48, 95% CI:0.82-2.67, p = 0.19) was associated with CMD. The predictive accuracy of HOMA-IR (c-statistic:0.63, 95% CI:0.54-0.72, p = 0.003) was higher than TyG index(c-statistic:0.55, 95% CI:0.47-0.63, p = 0.13), although the difference was not statistically significant (DeLong p = 0.23). There was strong evidence favoring a true difference between CMD vs. non-CMD groups for HOMA-IR (BF 10 :3507) but not for TyG index(BF10:0.66). CONCLUSIONS: HOMA-IR, but not TyG index, is closely associated with CMD. (c) 2024 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.135
dc.identifier.endpagee772
dc.identifier.issn1933-2874
dc.identifier.issn1876-4789
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid38955587
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197091452
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpagee764
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.135
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12214
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001367523900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Lipidology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectInsulin resistance
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectCoronary artery disease
dc.subjectMicrocirculation
dc.titleUsefulness of triglyceride-glucose index and homeostatic model assessment for predicting coronary microvascular dysfunction
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar