The activity and discussion points of #Circumcision through Twitter; a microblogging platform

dc.authorid0000-0002-7684-3632
dc.authorid0000-0001-5700-0835
dc.authorid0000-0001-5091-9654
dc.authorid0000-0001-8573-1192
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Taha
dc.contributor.authorCulpan, Meftun
dc.contributor.authorCaşkurlu, Turhan
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Mihsan
dc.contributor.authorSilay, Mesrur Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives Our objective was to elucidate the discussion points of circumcision on social media (SoMe) by looking at the Twitter activity. Material and methods Twitter searched for #circumcision hashtag via www.tweetarchivist.com, www.twitonomy.com, www.symplur.com. Total tweet numbers, most influencers, top users were documented. Tweets including female circumcision were excluded. The contents of the tweets were classified into four subgroups (medical, religious, social, and political) by two independent reviewers. All kinds of tweet activities were statistically analyzed. Results A total of 9795 users generated 15,989 tweets about circumcision in a 1 month period. Mean daily tweet activity was 532 for #circumcision. The content analysis revealed that 2224 (15.8%) medical, 1133 (8.0%) religious, 323 (2.2%) social and 10,470 (74.0%) political tweets have been sent out by the users. Contributors originated from 174 countries from 6 continents. Media organizations were accounted for 52% of the top 25 influencers in circumcision hashtag. The most common hashtags accompanying #circumcision were #HIV (4.9%), #babiesgotherpes (3.3%), #muslim (1.8%), #malegenitalmutilation (1.6%) respectively. Conclusions There is an increasing discussion about circumcision through SoMe. Our results provided that the discussion points are mostly driven by the media and the activists. The political tweets have been found to be the center of the discussion. SoMe usage should be increased by medical professionals for true information of the public.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41443-018-0058-y
dc.identifier.endpage252
dc.identifier.issn0955-9930
dc.identifier.issn1476-5489
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid30104670
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052497862
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage249
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0058-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10883
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000446463400008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Impotence Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectSocial Media
dc.subjectAppropriate Use
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titleThe activity and discussion points of #Circumcision through Twitter; a microblogging platform
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar