Could radiological parameters help to predict the failure of ureteral access sheath placement

dc.authorid0000-0002-4553-0027
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorKuzan, Taha Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorSahinler, Emre Burak
dc.contributor.authorKanberoglu, Ahmet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorArıkan, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorSobay, Resul
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:54:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractTo identify the radiological parameters which may help to predict the success of ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).The study included 49 patients in whom failure ureteral access sheath placement in RIRS and 49 control group patients who were successfully placement between January 2023 and December 2023. The age, gender, body mass index (BMI), non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), and kidney ureter bladder (KUB) radiographs were compared between the two groups. Measurements of the anteroposterior (ap) diameter of the pelvic inlet, anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet, interspinous distance diameter were taken from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), while pelvic anteroposterior diameter and pelvic lateral diameter were measured from kidney ureter bladder (KUB) radiography. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, body mass index, ap pelvic inlet diameter, ap pelvic outlet, and interspinous distance diameter. However, a statistically significant difference was found between the pelvic ap diameter and pelvic lateral diameter values measured on the KUB radiography. The values for pelvic ap diameter and pelvic lateral diameter measured in the KUB radiographs can be used to predict the likelihood of UAS passage during RIRC procedures. However, further studies with larger patient groups are needed to establish a cut-off value.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK)
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-024-01599-8
dc.identifier.issn2194-7228
dc.identifier.issn2194-7236
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid38918251
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196803437
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01599-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12987
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001254153800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofUrolithiasis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectUreteral Access Sheath
dc.subjectRetrograde Intrarenal surgery
dc.subjectKidney ureter bladder (KUB)
dc.titleCould radiological parameters help to predict the failure of ureteral access sheath placement
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
12987.pdf
Boyut:
721.21 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format