Evaluation of pleth variability index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation

dc.authorid0000-0002-2635-9295
dc.authorid0000-0001-9594-9064
dc.authorid0000-0001-9293-8116
dc.contributor.authorKonur, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Gulay Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Huseyin Ilksen
dc.contributor.authorBucak, Nizamettin
dc.contributor.authorAydogan, Mustafa Said
dc.contributor.authorYologlu, Saim
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:42:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractFluid management is challenging and still remains controversial in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The pleth variability index (PVI) has been shown to be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness of perioperative and critically ill patients; however, it has not been evaluated in OLT. This study was designed to examine whether the PVI can reliably predict fluid responsiveness in OLT and to compare PVI with other hemodynamic indexes that are measured using the PiCCO(2) monitoring system. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient was monitored using the noninvasive Masimo and PiCCO(2) monitoring system. PVI was obtained with a Masimo pulse oximeter. Cardiac index was obtained using a transpulmonary thermodilution technique (CITPTD). Stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation, and systemic vascular resistance index were measured using the PiCCO(2) system. Fluid loading (10 mL/kg colloid) was performed at two different phases during the operation, and fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CITPTD >= 15%. During the dissection phase and the anhepatic phase, respectively, 14 patients (56%) and 18 patients (75%) were classified as responders. There were no differences between the baseline values of the PVI of responders and nonresponders. Area under the curve for PVI was 0.56 (sensitivity 35%, specificity 90%, p = 0.58) at dissection phase, and was 0.55 (sensitivity 55%, specificity 66%, p = 0.58) at anhepatic phase. Of the parameters, a higher area under the curve value was found for SVV. We conclude that PVI was unable to predict fluid responsiveness with sufficient accuracy in patients undergoing OLT, but the SVV parameter was reliable. Copyright (C) 2016, Kaohsiung Medical University. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University Department of Scientific Research Projects [2012/58]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Inonu University Department of Scientific Research Projects (Project number: 2012/58).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.kjms.2016.05.014
dc.identifier.endpage380
dc.identifier.issn1607-551X
dc.identifier.issn2410-8650
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.pmid27450027
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2016.05.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10434
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000380757500006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofKaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectFluid responsiveness
dc.subjectLiver transplantation
dc.subjectPleth variability index
dc.titleEvaluation of pleth variability index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10434.pdf
Boyut:
487.74 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format