Reconstruction of vulva and perineal defects after gynecological oncological surgery and effectiveness of local flaps

dc.contributor.authorAksan, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorKarateke, Ateş
dc.contributor.authorUzuneyüpoğlu, Orkun
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Muhammed Beşir
dc.contributor.authorKüçükbaş, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T15:24:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: Although most defects can close by primary suturing after radical surgery of gynecological malignancies, different reconstruction options are available when large defects that require reconstruction occur. In this study, we present the treatment strategy and results for patients who underwent reconstruction after resection for gynecological cancer in the vulva and perineum. Material and Methods: A total of 18 patients who underwent reconstruction between May 2018 and July 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Demographics and clinical data, the resection operation, characteristics of the defect, and the reconstruction methods applied were evaluated. Postoperative treatment strategy and complication rates were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 62.3±13.2 (42-83) years. 88.9% of the patients had additional diseases. Pelvic exentration was performed in 5 (27.8%) patients, anterior resection in 2 (11.1%) patients and vulvectomy in 11 (61.1%) patients. The most common malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma, and mean defect size was 106±97 (12-476) cm2. Reconstruction was performed with a local fasciocutaneous flap in 16 (88.9%) patients, pedicled rectus myocutaneous flap in one (5.6%) patient, and skin graft in one (5.6%) patient. Wound complications occurred in 5 (27.8%) patients, partial flap necrosis in one (5.6%) patient, and recurrence in one (5.6%) patient in the long term. Conclusion: It is possible to reconstruction most of the vulva and perineal defects with local flaps after oncological resections, Considering the characteristics of the area and patient comorbidities, it should be kept in mind that prolonged wound problems may be seen, especially in vulvectomy patients. © 2021, Duzce University Medical School. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.18678/dtfd.911107
dc.identifier.endpage169
dc.identifier.issn1307-671X
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85113745847
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage164
dc.identifier.trdizinid498448
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.911107
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/498448
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6853
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDuzce University Medical School
dc.relation.ispartofDuzce Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250302
dc.subjectMorbidity; Neoplasm; Pelvic exenteration; Reconstructive; Vulvectomy; Wounds
dc.titleReconstruction of vulva and perineal defects after gynecological oncological surgery and effectiveness of local flaps
dc.title.alternativeJinekolojik onkolojik cerrahi sonrası oluşan vulva ve perine defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonu ve lokal fleplerin etkinliği
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6853.pdf
Boyut:
457.79 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format