Epidemiology of Febrile Neutropenic and Bacteremic Patients in the Extensively Drug-Resistant Era

dc.authorid0009-0003-3464-1762
dc.authorid0000-0001-6493-197X
dc.contributor.authorElbahr, Umran Sumeyse
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Amira
dc.contributor.authorHejres, Suha
dc.contributor.authorSurmeli, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorOzturk-Pala, Cigdem
dc.contributor.authorReyes, Clark Steven San Diego Delos
dc.contributor.authorElbahr, Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Appropriate empiric antibiotic use is of utmost importance in febrile neutropenic patients. This study analyzed positive blood culture reports from febrile neutropenic patients and provided a new empirical antibiotic treatment approach. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled febrile neutropenic patients with hematological or solid organ malignancies who had positive blood cultures at the Bahrain Oncology Center within January 2019 to August 2021. Microbiological data were used to draw inferences for rational antimicrobial treatment. The quick sequential organ failure assessment (gSOFA) score was employed to classify the severity status. The t-test was used to compare univariate and multivariate sensitivity values for two dependent proportions. Results: A total of 73 episodes of bacteremia were detected in 53 patients. Among these, 54 episodes (74%) were caused by gramnegative organisms. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coil (30%), Klebsiella pneumonia (22%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (11%). The rate of extensively drug-resistant strains among K pneumoniae was 44% (n = 7). Among gram-negative microorganisms, the susceptibility rates for monotherapies were reported for ceftazidime (56%), piperacillin/tazobactam (76%), cefepime (54%), meropenem (80%), and ceftazidime-avibactam (91%). The susceptibility rates for tigecycline-based combinations exceeded 90% overall. Conclusions: Clinical severity and local epidemiological data should be considered in the management of febrile neutropenia. New antibiotics and tigecycline should be considered for combination therapy in selected cases due to the increasing resistance observed.
dc.identifier.doi10.5812/archcid-135472
dc.identifier.issn2345-2641
dc.identifier.issn2008-1081
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192462872
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-135472
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8184
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001252704200002
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBrieflands
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Clinical Infectious Diseases
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectBacteremia
dc.subjectEmpiric Antibiotic
dc.subjectExtensively Drug -Resistant
dc.subjectFebrile Neutropenia
dc.subjectgSOFA
dc.titleEpidemiology of Febrile Neutropenic and Bacteremic Patients in the Extensively Drug-Resistant Era
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8184.pdf
Boyut:
222.32 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format