Our Experience of Permanent Brachytherapy inLocalized Prostate Cancer

dc.contributor.authorİlktaç, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, Senad
dc.contributor.authorÇalışkan, Selahattin
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Metin İshak
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Muhammet İhsan
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T14:06:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In this study, we present the short-term results of our brachytherapy series in patients with localized prostate cancer administered by a team led by urologists.Methods: Forty-one patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy between September 2003 and January 2007 were evaluated in this study. All patients had biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma. Low dose rate (LDR) Iodine-125 prostate brachyther-apy was performed under general anesthesia according to intraoperative-interactive planning and peripheral loading tech-nique. Preoperative and follow-up Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scores of all patients were determined.Results: Preoperative mean PSA, Gleason score and prostate volume of the patients were 7.7±5 ng/ml (4-22.5), 5.8±0.9 (4-8) and 36.8±12.6 ml (15-58 ml), respectively. The mean age of the patients was 62.3±6.3 (52-76) years. The mean follow-up period was 36.5 (7-60) months. Mean PSA value at the third (1.4±1.3 ng/ml) and sixth months (1.0±0.7 ng/ml) was signifi-cantly lower than preoperative mean PSA value (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between preoperative mean IPSS score (12.1±5.3) and mean IPSS scores at the third and sixth postoperative months (13.5±6.5 and 11.7±7.5, respectively, p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the mean preoperative IIEF score (14.2±2.6) and mean IIEF scores at the third and sixth postoperative months (11.3±6.5 and 10.8±7.5, respectively, p>0.05). TURP was performed in two patients after brachytherapy because of chronic urinary retention in one patient and because of increased lower urinary tract symptoms in other patient. One patient was referred to radiotherapy due to inadequate radioactivity in the dosimetric control tomography.Discussion and Conclusion: Brachytherapy is an effective method in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and it is recommended in current guidelines despite the recent decline in its use.
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/hnhj.2018.62681
dc.identifier.endpage193
dc.identifier.issn2630-5720
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage188
dc.identifier.trdizinid374466
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2018.62681
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/374466
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/5546
dc.identifier.volume60
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofHaydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20250302
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıp
dc.subjectOnkoloji
dc.titleOur Experience of Permanent Brachytherapy inLocalized Prostate Cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5546.pdf
Boyut:
515.33 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format