Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC

dc.authorid0000-0002-5033-1479
dc.authorid0000-0002-3982-7465
dc.authorid0000-0002-1372-4791
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Mahmut Emre
dc.contributor.authorKaradurmus, Nuri
dc.contributor.authorOkten, Ilker Nihat
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Haci Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorUrakci, Zuhat
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Sinemis
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:41:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackgrounds and Objectives Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311).Materials and Methods In this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups.Results A total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively (p = 0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively (p = 0.848).Conclusion According to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.
dc.description.sponsorshipOncology departments in Turkiye
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge all the support they have received from the Oncology departments in Turkiye.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10781552241241004
dc.identifier.issn1078-1552
dc.identifier.issn1477-092X
dc.identifier.pmid38613329
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190527263
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241241004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/10361
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001201466900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectcolon cancer
dc.subjecttargeted therapy
dc.subjectRas wild type
dc.titleReal-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar