Primary Care Service Usage According to the Type of Family Health Centers: Analysis of the Turkish Data of the QUALICOPC Study

dc.authorid0000-0002-8859-934X
dc.authorid0000-0002-9959-6240
dc.authorid0000-0002-7018-1607
dc.contributor.authorTuzun, Sabah
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDabak, Resat
dc.contributor.authorSargın, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorUnluoglu, Ilhami
dc.contributor.authorKalaca, Sibel
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description18th International Eastern Mediterranean Family Medicine Congress -- APR 25-28, 2019 -- TURKEY
dc.description.abstractAim: Family health centers (FHCs) are reimbursed for their current expenditures based on a classification of four clusters in Turkey. This study compared the coordination, comprehensiveness, continuity, accessibility, and the first contact of care among different reimbursement FHC groups.Methods: The data were obtained from the Turkish data of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe study. Data was collected in provinces from six geographical regions. Physicians and patients from Classes A and B FHCs were called the first group, and others were called the second group.Results: A total of 296 physicians and 2623 patients were enrolled. According to the reimbursement groups, 593 (22.6%) patients received services from the first group and 2012 (77.4%) patients from the second group. The first contact with care and the admission frequency of 3 or more in the last six months were higher in the first group (respectively, 99.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.027; 55.4% vs. 49.6%, p=0.015).Conclusion: The reimbursement classification did not make a difference in coordination, comprehensive care, continuity, accessibility, and being the first contact of care. Therefore, the current classification does not contribute to improving the quality of primary care in terms of service provision.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/haseki.galenos.2023.8757
dc.identifier.endpage80
dc.identifier.issn1302-0072
dc.identifier.issn2147-2688
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153355553
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage72
dc.identifier.trdizinid1167118
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2023.8757
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1167118
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13391
dc.identifier.volume61
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000964288500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofHaseki Tip Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectFamily practices
dc.subjectorganization and administration
dc.subjectcomprehensive healthcare
dc.subjectcontinuity of care
dc.subjecthealth services administration
dc.titlePrimary Care Service Usage According to the Type of Family Health Centers: Analysis of the Turkish Data of the QUALICOPC Study
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13391.pdf
Boyut:
648.83 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format