Empirical cefepime plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin versus meropenem plus vancomycin in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis: results of the multicenter ephesus study

dc.authorid0000-0001-9937-6267
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, Oguz Resat
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorOrmen, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorCicek-Senturk, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorMermer, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorOnal, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorAmer, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:34:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground Herein, we analyzed the efficacy of main antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis (HCAM).Materials/methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 18 tertiary-care academic hospitals Turkey, India, Egypt and Romania. We extracted data and outcomes of all patients with post-neurosurgical meningitis cases fulfilling the study inclusion criteria and treated with empirical therapy between December 2006-September 2018.Results Twenty patients in the cefepime + vancomycin-(CV) group, 31 patients in the ceftazidime + vancomycin-(CFV) group, and 119 patients in the meropenem + vancomycin-(MV) group met the inclusion criteria. The MV subgroup had a significantly higher mean Glasgow Coma Score, a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit within the previous month, and a higher rate of antibiot herapy within the previous month before the meningitis episode (p < 0.05). Microbiological success on Day 3-5, end of treatment (EOT) clinical success (80% vs. 54.8%% vs 57.9%), and overall success (EOT success followed by one-month survival without relapse or reinfection 65% vs. 51.6% vs. 45.3%), EOT all cause mortality (ACM) and day 30 ACM (15% vs. 22.6% vs. 26%) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among the three cohorts. No regimen was effective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria, and vancomycin resulted in an EOT clinical success rate of 60.6% in the methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci subgroup (n = 34).Conclusions Our study showed no significant difference in terms of clinical success and mortality among the three treatment options. All regimens were ineffective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Vancomycin was unsuccessful in approximately 40% of cases involving methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid37770836
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85172827939
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8464
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001078643300003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBmc
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Infectious Diseases
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectHealthcare-associated meningitis
dc.subjectEmpirical therapy
dc.subjectMulticenter study
dc.subjectGlycopeptides
dc.subjectAntibiotics
dc.titleEmpirical cefepime plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin versus meropenem plus vancomycin in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis: results of the multicenter ephesus study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8464.pdf
Boyut:
1.18 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format