Does robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

dc.authorid0000-0001-7030-0787
dc.authorid0000-0001-8549-4449
dc.authorid0000-0003-1330-2051
dc.contributor.authorMustafaoglu, Rustem
dc.contributor.authorErhan, Belgin
dc.contributor.authorYeldan, Ipek
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Berrin
dc.contributor.authorTarakci, Ela
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL) in stroke rehabilitation. Fifty-one stroke patients randomly assigned to Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 received conventional training (CT) plus RAGT, CT, and RAGT, respectively. The training duration was for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Barthel Index (BI), Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL), 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), and Stair Climbing Test (SCT). The secondary outcomes were Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Comfortable 10-m Walk Test (CWT), Fast 10-m Walk Test (FWT), and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). The mean change in all the primary [BI (p = 0.001), 6-MWT (p = 0.001), SS-QOL (p < 0.0001), and SCT (p = 0.004)] and except the FWT (p = 0.354) all the other secondary outcomes [FMA-LE (p = 0.049), CWT (p = 0.025) and RPE (p = 0.023)] improved significantly between the three groups. In the subgroup analysis, BI, 6-MWT, SS-QOL, and SCT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.016). However, FMA-LE, CWT, and the RPE significantly improved in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and, also, only CWT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.011). In a subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (p > 0.05). While combined training leads to more improvement in mobility, ADLs, and QoL, CT showed a similar improvement compared to the RAGT in stroke patients.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13760-020-01276-8
dc.identifier.endpage344
dc.identifier.issn0300-9009
dc.identifier.issn2240-2993
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid31989505
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078424141
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage335
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01276-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11608
dc.identifier.volume120
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000515606100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofActa Neurologica Belgica
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectActivities of daily living
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectRobotics
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleDoes robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar