Anterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation of corneal epithelium healing time after 2 different surface ablation methods

dc.authorid0000-0002-2563-2149
dc.authorid0000-0002-5079-4713
dc.authorid0000-0002-2267-6656
dc.contributor.authorEliacik, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBayramlar, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorErdur, Sevil K.
dc.contributor.authorKarabela, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Goktug
dc.contributor.authorGulkilik, Ibrahim G.
dc.contributor.authorOzsutcu, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare epithelial healing time following laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods: This prospective interventional case series study comprised 56 eyes of 28 patients that underwent laser refractive surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Medipol University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey, between March 2014 and May 2014. Each patient was randomized to have one eye operated on with PRK, and the other with LASEK. Patients were examined daily for 5 days, and epithelial healing time was assessed by using AS-OCT without removing therapeutic contact lens (TCL). Average discomfort scores were calculated from ratings obtained from questions regarding pain, photophobia, and lacrimation according to a scale of 0 (none) to 5. Results: The mean re-epithelialization time assessed with AS-OCT was 3.07 +/- 0.64 days in the PRK group, 3.55 +/- 0.54 days in the LASEK group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). Mean subjective discomfort score was 4.42 +/- 0.50 in the PRK eyes, and 2.85 +/- 0.44 in the LASEK eyes on the first exam day (p=0.001). The score obtained on the second (p=0.024), and third day (p=0.03) were also statistically significant. The fourth (p=0.069), and fifth days scores (p=0.1) showed no statistically significant difference between groups. Conclusion: The PRK showed a statistically significant shorter epithelial healing time, but had a statistically significant higher discomfort score until the postoperative fourth day compared with LASEK.
dc.identifier.doi10.15537/smj.2015.1.9983
dc.identifier.endpage72
dc.identifier.issn0379-5284
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid25630007
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage67
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.9983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8759
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349405000011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSaudi Med J
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectAssisted Subepithelial Keratectomy
dc.subjectPhotorefractive Keratectomy
dc.subjectMyopia
dc.subjectLasek
dc.subjectPrk
dc.subjectKeratomileusis
dc.subjectMetaanalysis
dc.subjectDebridement
dc.subjectAlcohol
dc.titleAnterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation of corneal epithelium healing time after 2 different surface ablation methods
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8759.pdf
Boyut:
881.66 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format