Topographic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Corneas in Patients With Ocular Rosacea

dc.authorid0000-0001-6430-2233
dc.authorid0000-0001-5435-075X
dc.authorid0000-0001-8197-2458
dc.authorid0000-0002-4161-0919
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorOlcucu, Onur
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.contributor.authorKarakucuk, Yalcin
dc.contributor.authorAlagoz, Nese
dc.contributor.authorMutaf, Cagri
dc.contributor.authorDemirok, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:38:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the topographic and biomechanical properties of corneas in the eyes of patients with ocular rosacea (OR) with those of healthy individuals. Methods: Thirty-four healthy individuals (control group) and 34 patients with OR (study group) were evaluated in this study. Topographic measurements including keratometry values, irregularity, and surface asymmetry index in the right eye of each participant were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera with a Placido disc topographer (Sirius). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOP), and Goldmann-related IOP were measured using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Central corneal thickness was also measured using ultrasonic pachymetry and the Sirius corneal topography system. Results: Topographic parameters were not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Mean CH and CRF were significantly lower in patients with OR (P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Central corneal thickness was significantly lower in patients with OR compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). Mean Goldmann-related IOP and corneal-compensated IOP were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.09 and 0.13, respectively). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that although the eyes of patients with OR had corneal topographic findings similar to those of healthy controls, corneal biomechanical measurements (CH and CRF) were significantly lower in patients with OR. These results need to be considered when planning corneal refractive surgery in patients with OR.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICO.0000000000000350
dc.identifier.endpage317
dc.identifier.issn0277-3740
dc.identifier.issn1536-4798
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid25611397
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84923530387
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage313
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000350
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/9499
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349453900017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofCornea
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectoccular rosacea
dc.subjectocular response analyzer
dc.subjectcentral corneal thickness
dc.subjectcorneal topography
dc.titleTopographic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Corneas in Patients With Ocular Rosacea
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
9499.pdf
Boyut:
210.46 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format