Nutritional status and surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia: findings from Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry

dc.contributor.authorSoyer, Tutku
dc.contributor.authorBostanci, Suleyman Arif
dc.contributor.authorDurakbasa, Cigdem Ulukaya
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Coskun
dc.contributor.authorCiftci, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorGollu, Gulnur
dc.contributor.authorParlak, Ayse
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-16T19:33:18Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the relationship between nutritional status and surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) from the Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry (TEAR). Methods Between 2015 and 2024, 713 patients with the complete data of neonatal period and first year of life were included. According to FENTON, growth charts and patients were grouped as small for gestational age (SGA, < 10 percentiles), medium SGA (percentiles = 10-20), appropriate for gestational age (AGA, percentiles = 20-90) and large for gestational age (LGA, percentiles > 90) at birth. The z scores for height-for-weight were reevaluated at 6th and 12th months of age. Results Among 713 patients, 56% were boys. 23.7% of patients were SGA. There was no difference among groups for demographic features, outcomes, and mortality (p > 0.05). Patients with SGA had a higher rate of karyotype anomalies (23.1%, p < 0.05). At the 6th month, 20% of patients had improved nutritional status, 46.2% unchanged, and 33.5% worsened. At the 12th month, it was 31.6%, 50.2%, and 18.3%, respectively. 32.8% of the SGA patients had severe malnutrition at the 6th month, while this rate decreased to 10.2% at the end of the first year of life. Patients with worsened nutritional status had a significantly higher rate of mortality (10.2%) than patients with unchanged and improved nutritional status (3.7%, 2%, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between nutritional status and surgical outcomes at the 6th and 12th months (p > 0.05). Conclusions The incidence of SGA was significantly higher in EA patients with karyotype anomalies. While 20% of patients improved nutritional status at the 6th month, only one-third of patients improved nutritional status at the end of the first year. Closer follow-up is needed in patients with EA to avoid malnutrition, which can lead to poor growth, developmental delay, and impaired immune function.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00383-025-06216-2
dc.identifier.issn0179-0358
dc.identifier.issn1437-9813
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid41046286
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017832692
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06216-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/15011
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001587573600002
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Surgery International
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectMalnutrition
dc.subjectEsophageal atresia
dc.subjectTracheoesophageal fistula
dc.subjectChildren
dc.titleNutritional status and surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia: findings from Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar