Is testis-sparing surgery safe in small testicular masses? Results of a multicentre study

dc.authorid0000-0002-4136-7584
dc.authorid0000-0002-4353-9538
dc.authorid0000-0003-1356-553X
dc.authorid0000-0003-0670-6840
dc.authorid0000-0002-5293-7837
dc.authorid0000-0001-6426-1398
dc.authorid0000-0003-2482-797X
dc.contributor.authorKeske, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCanda, Abdullah Erdem
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorKibar, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorTuygun, Can
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Evrim
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:32:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Our goal was to evaluate benign and malignant lesions and testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN) in the neighbouring normal-appearing testis tissue in men who underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular mass with a pathologic tumour size of <= 3cm. Methods: In this retrospective, multicentre study, data of 252 patients from 11 different institutions were included. Patients were divided into three groups based on tumour size: Group 1 (0-1 cm; n=35), Group 2 (1.1-2cm; n=99), and Group 3 (2.1-3 cm; n=118). Benign lesions and TIN were sought in the neighbouring testicular tissue and compared between groups. Results: Mean patient age was 32.3 years. Benign lesions were reported in 54.3%, 33.3%, and 14.4% of Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05 between groups). TIN was detected in 20%, 42.4%, and 41.5% of Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05 for Group 1 vs. Groups 2 and 3; p>0.05 for Groups 2 vs. 3). Multifocality was detected in 8.6%, 4%, and 0% of Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05 for both Group 1 vs. Group3 and for Group 2 vs. Group 3; p>0.05 for Group 1vs. Group 2). A tumour cutoff size of 1.5 cm was found to be significant for detecting benign tumour. TIN and multifocality rates were similar in patients with a tumour size of <= 1.5 vs. > 1.5 cm (p>0.05). Conclusions: Benign lesions and TIN in the neighbouring testis were significantly decreased and multifocality was increased in patients with a tumour mass size of <= 1 cm. Testis-sparing surgery should be performed with caution and a safety rim of normal tissue should also be excised.
dc.identifier.doi10.5489/cuaj.4016
dc.identifier.endpageE104
dc.identifier.issn1911-6470
dc.identifier.issn1920-1214
dc.identifier.issue3-4
dc.identifier.pmid28360955
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85016207804
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpageE100
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8133
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000402820900007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Association
dc.relation.ispartofCuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectFrozen-Section Analysis
dc.subjectGerm-Cell Tumors
dc.subjectUltrasonographic Lesions
dc.subjectSingle-Center
dc.titleIs testis-sparing surgery safe in small testicular masses? Results of a multicentre study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8133.pdf
Boyut:
250.01 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format