A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery

dc.authorid0000-0002-8557-4673
dc.contributor.authorKaradağ, Remzi
dc.contributor.authorSevimli, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorOkumus, Seydi
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Isilay
dc.contributor.authorBayramlar, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorDurucu, Ela
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Umit
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:32:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the effects of 90 degrees and 180 degrees conjunctival rotational autograft (CRA) techniques used in primary pterygium surgery. Methods: Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA), corneal topography, and auto-refractometer measurements, as well as detailed biomicroscopic examinations, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, the pterygium tissue was excised then rotated 90 degrees in Group 1 and 180 degrees in Group 2, after which it was sutured to the bare sclera. Pterygium recurrence was defined as corneal invasion >= 1 mm. Results: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 45.1 +/- 11.8 years, while Group 2 comprised 24 patients with a mean age of 47.9 +/- 13.8 years. The pterygia in Group 1 were graded as more advanced than those in Group 2. A similar number of recurrences were observed in Group 1 (14.3%) and in Group 2 (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the preoperative and postoperative VA and astigmatism values between the two groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative VA and astigmatism values in Group 1 and in the postoperative astigmatism values in Group 2. Although postoperative redness was more common in Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: BothCRA techniques can be successful in patients for whom it is desirable to avoid a conjunctival autograft and for patients without high cosmetic expectations.
dc.identifier.doi10.5935/0004-2749.20170091
dc.identifier.endpage377
dc.identifier.issn0004-2749
dc.identifier.issn1678-2925
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid29267573
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038371037
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20170091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8208
dc.identifier.volume80
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000418526100008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherConsel Brasil Oftalmologia
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectAutografts
dc.subjectConjunctiva/transplantation
dc.subjectPterygium/surgery
dc.subjectTransplantation
dc.subjectautologous/methods
dc.titleA comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8208.pdf
Boyut:
584.41 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format