A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
| dc.authorid | 0000-0002-8557-4673 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karadağ, Remzi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sevimli, Neslihan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Okumus, Seydi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozsoy, Isilay | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bayramlar, Hüseyin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Durucu, Ela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aksoy, Umit | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T19:32:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare the effects of 90 degrees and 180 degrees conjunctival rotational autograft (CRA) techniques used in primary pterygium surgery. Methods: Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA), corneal topography, and auto-refractometer measurements, as well as detailed biomicroscopic examinations, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, the pterygium tissue was excised then rotated 90 degrees in Group 1 and 180 degrees in Group 2, after which it was sutured to the bare sclera. Pterygium recurrence was defined as corneal invasion >= 1 mm. Results: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 45.1 +/- 11.8 years, while Group 2 comprised 24 patients with a mean age of 47.9 +/- 13.8 years. The pterygia in Group 1 were graded as more advanced than those in Group 2. A similar number of recurrences were observed in Group 1 (14.3%) and in Group 2 (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the preoperative and postoperative VA and astigmatism values between the two groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative VA and astigmatism values in Group 1 and in the postoperative astigmatism values in Group 2. Although postoperative redness was more common in Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: BothCRA techniques can be successful in patients for whom it is desirable to avoid a conjunctival autograft and for patients without high cosmetic expectations. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5935/0004-2749.20170091 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 377 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-2749 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1678-2925 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 29267573 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85038371037 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 373 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20170091 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8208 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 80 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000418526100008 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Consel Brasil Oftalmologia | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20250302 | |
| dc.subject | Autografts | |
| dc.subject | Conjunctiva/transplantation | |
| dc.subject | Pterygium/surgery | |
| dc.subject | Transplantation | |
| dc.subject | autologous/methods | |
| dc.title | A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery | |
| dc.type | Article |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1










