Retrospective analysis of three different xenografts in maxillary sinus augmentation: Histologic and three-dimensional radiologic study

dc.contributor.authorCinar, Ihsan Caglar
dc.contributor.authorZboun, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Bahattin Alper
dc.contributor.authorSaglanmak, Alper
dc.contributor.authorAkay, Ayse Sumeyye
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T15:24:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Low bone density and lack of adequate vertical bone dimension as a result of maxillary sinus pneumatization present some of the most problematic cases for endosseous implant applications in posterior maxillary regions that hinder prosthetic rehabilitation. The overall objectives of the study were to assess the histologic, histomorphometric, and radiologic evaluation of biopsies gathered from maxillary sinuses that were grafted with three different bovine bone particles (Bio-Oss, Cerabone, and Ti-Oss) and analyze the volume of the bone graft and the quantity of new bone formation. Method and materials: Thirty-six patients with < 4 mm of residual ridge height unilaterally in the posterior maxilla were equally divided into three groups, each of which received different bovine bone particles for maxillary sinus augmentation. Six months later, biopsies were harvested for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations. Volumetric changes in maxillary sinus augmentation were analyzed at 1-week and 6-month time-points following maxillary sinus augmentation surgery. Results: Histomorphometric and histologic analysis revealed a significant difference between the Ti-Oss group compared with the Bio-Oss and Cerabone groups (P=.011). In terms ofresidual graft particles and soft tissue, there were no significant differences between groups. 3D volumetric reductions between 1-week (baseline) and 6-month time-points recorded significant graft volume reduction in all groups (P <. 05). Significantly greater bone resorption and lower new-bone formation were manifested in the Ti-Oss group in comparison to the other groups. Conclusions: Within the limits of thisstudy, histologic and radiologic results indicated that Bio-Oss and Cerabone could be used efficiently in sinus augmentation procedures, while further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the Ti-Oss material in maxillary sinus augmentation. (Quintessence Int 2023;54:640-649; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4146671). © 2023 Quintessence Publishing Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.qi.b4146671
dc.identifier.endpage649
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid37288651
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171806895
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage640
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4146671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6674
dc.identifier.volume54
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherQuintessenz Verlags-GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence International
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250302
dc.subjectbone volume; bovine bone; endosseous implant; histomorphometry; maxillary sinus pneumatization; sinus augmentation
dc.titleRetrospective analysis of three different xenografts in maxillary sinus augmentation: Histologic and three-dimensional radiologic study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar