Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?

dc.authorid0000-0003-3318-3555
dc.authorid0000-0001-7063-7371
dc.authorid0000-0003-2490-9449
dc.authorid0000-0002-6803-5467
dc.contributor.authorEser, M. B.
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, B.
dc.contributor.authorDogan, M. B.
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, N.
dc.contributor.authorKalcioglu, M. T.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:36:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior studies have evaluated cochlear length using CT to select the most suitable cochlear implants and obtain patient-specific anatomy. This study aimed to test the accuracy and reliability of cochlear lateral wall length measurements using 3D MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two observers measured the cochlear lateral wall length of 35 patients (21 men) with postlingual hearing loss using CT and MR imaging. The intraclass correlation coefficient (with 95% confidence intervals) was used to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the 3D cochlear measurements. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 39.85 (SD, 16.60)?years. Observer 1 measured the mean lateral wall length as 41.52 (SD, 2.25)?mm on CT and 41.44 (SD, 2.18)?mm on MR imaging, with a mean difference of 0.08?mm (95% CI, ?0.11 to 0.27 mm), while observer 2 measured the mean lateral wall length as 41.74 (SD, 2.69)?mm on CT and 42.34 (SD, 2.53)?mm on MR imaging, with a mean difference of ?0.59?mm (95% CI, ?1.00 to ?0.20 mm). An intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84?0.94) for CT and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.46?0.82) for MR imaging was obtained for the interobserver reliability for the full-turn cochlear lateral wall length. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based 3D cochlear measurements show excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability, while MR imaging?based lateral wall length measurements have good-to-excellent intraobserver reliability and moderate interobserver reliability. These results corroborate the use of CT for 3D cochlear measurements as a reference method and demonstrate MR imaging to be an alternative acquisition technique with comparably reliable results.
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A7287
dc.identifier.endpage2022
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108
dc.identifier.issn1936-959X
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.pmid34593380
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119151405
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7287
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/9198
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000743897300017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmer Soc Neuroradiology
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectDriven Equilibrium
dc.subjectEcho Sequences
dc.subjectSpin-Echo
dc.subjectCt
dc.subjectCisternography
dc.titleMeasuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
9198.pdf
Boyut:
1.66 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format