Five-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study

dc.authorid0000-0001-8034-250X
dc.contributor.authorAygun, Beril Tulu
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Kadir Ilker
dc.contributor.authorAğca, Alper
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Burcin Kepez
dc.contributor.authorSucu, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorBesek, Nilay Kandemir
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:38:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the long-term refractive and visual outcomes and the corneal higher-order aberrations of contralateral eyes of patients who received small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in one eye and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in the other eye. Setting: Refractive Surgery Clinic of the University of Health Sciences Beyog. lu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: The medical files of patients who received SMILE in one eye and FS-LASIK in the contralateral eye for myopia and myopic astigmatism were reviewed. Postoperative examinations at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were evaluated. The main outcome measures were the comparison of the refractive and visual outcomes and the effect on corneal higher-order aberrations between the procedures. Results: This study included 44 eyes from 22 patients. At the 5-year follow-up, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity improved to 0.03 +/- 0.06 and 0.02 +/- 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range 0.15 to similar to 0.08 and 0.10 to similar to 0.08) for SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P =.572). At 5 years, all eyes in both groups were within +/- 1.00 diopter of attempted spherical equivalent refraction, and no statistically significant difference was found between the intended and achieved correction comparing the groups at any time points. None of the aberrations showed a difference between the groups at any time. Conclusions: Both SMILE and FS-LASIK were safe and similar in terms of efficacy and predictability at long-term follow-up for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000067
dc.identifier.endpage409
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid32142498
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85081946062
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage403
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/9510
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000579535500012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectMyopic Astigmatism
dc.subjectClinical-Outcomes
dc.subjectGuided Lasik
dc.subjectSmile
dc.titleFive-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
9505.pdf
Boyut:
397.75 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format