Are long-term auditory results following ossiculoplasty with bone cement as successful as early-middle period results?

dc.authorid0000-0002-0965-1390
dc.authorid0000-0001-8557-0886
dc.authorid0000-0001-8020-0659
dc.authorid0000-0002-4943-4577
dc.contributor.authorKalcıoğlu, M. Tayyar
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Muhammed Zeki
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Osman
dc.contributor.authorTuysuz, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorTan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzdamar, Osman Ilkay
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Bone-cement (BC) ossiculoplasty is one of the options to solve ossicular chain problems. Many authors reported successful results in the early or mid-follow-up period; however, there is no long-term result in the literature. We aim to evaluate long term results of BC ossiculoplasty. Materials and methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent BC ossiculoplasty as incudostapedial re-bridging by the same surgeon were invited to evaluation. Postoperative otomicroscopic examination was performed. Preoperative and post-operative audiological results after longer follow up and graft success rate were noted. Results: Fourteen patients came for control examination. The follow-up period was between 87 and 135 months (mean 102 months). None of the patients had graft failure. Ten patients had early postoperative follow-up results (between 10 and 52; mean 24 months). In the comparison of preoperative and early postoperative air-bone gap, there were significant differences in all frequencies while the comparison of preoperative and long-term postoperative results showed a significant difference only in 250 and 500 Hz. Early postoperative results were better than late with significant difference only in the 2000 and 4000 Hz. Conclusions: As reported by many studies, bone cement application provides a significant auditory improvement in the early postoperative period. The results of the present study showed that this early auditory success may decrease over time with a long-term follow-up. Further studies should be conducted with larger patient groups to clarify the long-term benefits of this treatment and possible causes for its deterioration.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102620
dc.identifier.issn0196-0709
dc.identifier.issn1532-818X
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid32599440
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087049323
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102620
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11710
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000600415600023
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectBone cement
dc.subjectOssiculoplasty
dc.subjectLong term results
dc.subjectAudiometry
dc.subjectPure-tone
dc.subjectHearing
dc.titleAre long-term auditory results following ossiculoplasty with bone cement as successful as early-middle period results?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar